Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 1999 Feb;6(1):79-84.
doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(99)80046-2.

Reduction of cannula-related laparoscopic complications using a radially expanding access device

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Reduction of cannula-related laparoscopic complications using a radially expanding access device

D I Galen et al. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1999 Feb.

Abstract

Study objective: To determine the safety of a new radially expanding access device compared with complication rates associated with sharp laparoscopic cannulas.

Design: Prospective, multicenter study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1).

Setting: Free-standing and hospital-based ambulatory surgery centers.

Patients: Two hundred twelve women undergoing various laparoscopic procedures and followed over 44 months.

Intervention: Five hundred forty-one radially dilating access devices were used exclusively for laparoscopic abdominal wall access.

Measurements and main results: No major vascular injury, abdominal wall bleeding, intestinal injury, bladder or ureteral injury, liver trauma, or postoperative incisional hernia occurred. One patient developed a postoperative mesenteric hematoma probably caused by a venous injury from the Veress needle. Of the 541 radially expanding access cannulas placed, only 6 (1%) slipped, despite absence of fascial anchoring devices.

Conclusion: Radially dilating abdominal access devices may reduce laparoscopic complications, lessen a surgeon's exposure to liability, and improve patient outcomes while reducing facility costs. (J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 6(1):79-84, 1999)

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types