Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1998 Dec;15(4):263-71.

The efficacy and effectiveness of a primary preventive dental programme in non-fluoridated areas of Victoria, Australia

Affiliations
  • PMID: 9973728
Comparative Study

The efficacy and effectiveness of a primary preventive dental programme in non-fluoridated areas of Victoria, Australia

M V Morgan et al. Community Dent Health. 1998 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the efficacy and effectiveness of a primary preventive dental programme.

Design: A field trial comparing an intervention and control group over three years. The intervention group received a preventive programme which consisted of a weekly fluoride mouthrinse (0.2% neutral NaF), an annual application, replacement or repair of pit and fissure sealants, and an annual oral hygiene education programme. The control group received the oral hygiene education programme only. Examinations to record dental caries status were conducted annually for both study groups.

Setting: Five secondary colleges in two non-fluoridated regions of Victoria, Australia.

Subjects: 522 subjects aged 12-13 years and considered at high risk of developing dental caries were recruited for the study; 256 received the preventive programme and 266 acted as controls.

Outcome measures: Dental caries was diagnosed according to World Health Organization criteria.

Results: Subjects in the intervention group who completed the three-year preventive programme (efficacy) incurred an average of 1.49 fewer decayed, missing or filled tooth surfaces than the control group. The difference was highly statistically significant. The programme also had a statistically significant impact when analysed by intention-to-treat (effectiveness), even when it was assumed that subjects lost to follow-up received minimal future benefit. Approximately 70% of the improvement in oral health was in the pit and fissure surfaces, with the remainder in the smooth surfaces.

Conclusion: A comprehensive preventive dental programme introduced into adolescent populations at high risk of developing dental caries can result in significant improvements in their dental health. Further research is required to clarify the public health impact of school-based fluoride mouth rinsing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources