"Comparative Effectiveness Research/statistics and numerical data"[MeSH] - Search Results

Year	Number of Results
2003	1
2009	2
2010	12
2011	9
2012	12
2013	15
2014	11
2015	10
2016	12
2017	12
2018	10
2019	13
2020	5
2021	2
2025	5

1

Specifying a target trial prevents immortal time bias and other self-inflicted injuries in observational analyses.

Hernán MA, Sauer BC, Hernández-Díaz S, Platt R, Shrier I. Hernán MA, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;79:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 May 27. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016. PMID: 27237061 Free PMC article. Review.

2

Introduction.

Mullins CD, Sanchez RJ. Mullins CD, et al. J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.s9-a.S03. J Manag Care Pharm. 2011. PMID: 22074667 Free PMC article.

3

Psychometrics: Trust, but Verify.

Vetter TR, Cubbin C. Vetter TR, et al. Anesth Analg. 2019 Jan;128(1):176-181. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003859. Anesth Analg. 2019. PMID: 30379673 Free PMC article. Review.

4

Health researcher views on comparative effectiveness research and research engagement.

Forsythe LP, Frank LB, Workman TA, Borsky A, Hilliard T, Harwell D, Fayish L. Forsythe LP, et al. J Comp Eff Res. 2017 May;6(3):245-256. doi: 10.2217/cer-2016-0063. Epub 2017 Feb 8. J Comp Eff Res. 2017. PMID: 28173710 Free article.

5

Comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research: enhancing uptake and use by patients, clinicians and payers.

Schumock GT, Pickard AS. Schumock GT, et al. J Comp Eff Res. 2018 Feb;7(2):177-180. doi: 10.2217/cer-2017-0057. Epub 2018 Feb 21. J Comp Eff Res. 2018. PMID: 29464965 Free article.

6

Attitudes toward comparative effectiveness research and patient engagement among reproductive health clinicians.

Kohn J, Unger Z, Dolatshahi J, Simons H, Rein A. Kohn J, et al. J Comp Eff Res. 2017 Jun;6(4):337-345. doi: 10.2217/cer-2016-0068. Epub 2017 Jun 16. J Comp Eff Res. 2017. PMID: 28621553 Free article.

7

Stakeholder assessment of comparative effectiveness research needs for Medicaid populations.

Fischer MA, Allen-Coleman C, Farrell SF, Schneeweiss S. Fischer MA, et al. J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Sep;4(5):465-71. doi: 10.2217/cer.15.26. Epub 2015 Sep 21. J Comp Eff Res. 2015. PMID: 26388438 Free PMC article. Review.

8

Neuraxial vs general anaesthesia for total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of comparative-effectiveness research.

Johnson RL, Kopp SL, Burkle CM, Duncan CM, Jacob AK, Erwin PJ, Murad MH, Mantilla CB. Johnson RL, et al. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):163-76. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev455. Br J Anaesth. 2016. PMID: 26787787 Free article.

9

Comparing drug effectiveness in children: A systematic review.

Dukanovic J, Osokogu OU, Patel K, Ferrajolo C, Sturkenboom MCJM; Global Research in Pediatrics project. Dukanovic J, et al. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Dec;27(12):1295-1301. doi: 10.1002/pds.4676. Epub 2018 Oct 31. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018. PMID: 30379371

10

Systematic review of comparative effectiveness data for oncology orphan drugs.

Cheng MM, Ramsey SD, Devine EB, Garrison LP, Bresnahan BW, Veenstra DL. Cheng MM, et al. Am J Manag Care. 2012 Jan;18(1):47-62. Am J Manag Care. 2012. PMID: 22435748 Free article.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Results by year

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

116 results

Results by year

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Results by year

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

116 results

Results by year