Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
1942 1
1944 1
1946 3
1947 1
1950 1
1951 3
1953 1
1955 3
1956 3
1957 1
1958 3
1959 1
1962 1
1963 4
1964 2
1965 2
1966 5
1967 1
1968 7
1969 4
1971 7
1972 14
1973 5
1974 13
1975 8
1976 29
1977 28
1978 23
1979 18
1980 19
1981 24
1982 26
1983 35
1984 61
1985 52
1986 43
1987 62
1988 210
1989 514
1990 679
1991 732
1992 746
1993 929
1994 1036
1995 1057
1996 1320
1997 1656
1998 2158
1999 2303
2000 2207
2001 2282
2002 2224
2003 2484
2004 2797
2005 2854
2006 3235
2007 3725
2008 3653
2009 3708
2010 3977
2011 3720
2012 3975
2013 4132
2014 4106
2015 4122
2016 3819
2017 3938
2018 4066
2019 3958
2020 3182
2021 2248
2022 1656
2023 2003
2024 2082
2025 1205

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

86,921 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Nursing program evaluation for Nurse Educators.
Lannan SA. Lannan SA. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Aug;55:17-19. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 9. Nurse Educ Today. 2017. PMID: 28505520 No abstract available.
A framework for evaluating health promotion programs.
O'Connor-Fleming ML, Parker E, Higgins H, Gould T. O'Connor-Fleming ML, et al. Health Promot J Austr. 2006 Apr;17(1):61-6. doi: 10.1071/he06061. Health Promot J Austr. 2006. PMID: 16619938 Free article.
Training evaluation.
Nemec PB. Nemec PB. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2018 Mar;41(1):80-81. doi: 10.1037/prj0000291. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2018. PMID: 29494199
Evaluating the program.
Waltz CF. Waltz CF. NLN Publ. 1989 May;(15-2282):157-215. NLN Publ. 1989. PMID: 2501753 Review.
Innovative Methods for Designing Actionable Program Evaluation.
Nesbit B, Hertz M, Thigpen S, Castellanos T, Brown M, Porter J, Williams A. Nesbit B, et al. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Jan/Feb;24 Suppl 1 Suppl, Injury and Violence Prevention(Suppl 1 INJURY AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION):S12-S22. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000682. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018. PMID: 29189500 Free PMC article.
Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis.
Brousselle A, Champagne F. Brousselle A, et al. Eval Program Plann. 2011 Feb;34(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 Jun 11. Eval Program Plann. 2011. PMID: 20541262
Methods in realist evaluation: A mapping review.
Renmans D, Castellano Pleguezuelo V. Renmans D, et al. Eval Program Plann. 2023 Apr;97:102209. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102209. Epub 2022 Dec 21. Eval Program Plann. 2023. PMID: 36571967 Review.
Systems thinking.
Cabrera D, Colosi L, Lobdell C. Cabrera D, et al. Eval Program Plann. 2008 Aug;31(3):299-310. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.12.001. Epub 2008 Jan 5. Eval Program Plann. 2008. PMID: 18272224
86,921 results
You have reached the last available page of results. Please see the User Guide for more information.