Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 1;24(1):93.
doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03331-x.

Study of myopia progression and risk factors in Hubei children aged 7-10 years using machine learning: a longitudinal cohort

Affiliations

Study of myopia progression and risk factors in Hubei children aged 7-10 years using machine learning: a longitudinal cohort

Wenping Li et al. BMC Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Background: To investigate the trend of refractive error among elementary school students in grades 1 to 3 in Hubei Province, analyze the relevant factors affecting myopia progression, and develop a model to predict myopia progression and the risk of developing high myopia in children.

Methods: Longitudinal study. Using a cluster-stratified sampling method, elementary school students in grades 1 to 3 (15,512 in total) from 17 cities in Hubei Province were included as study subjects. Visual acuity, cycloplegic autorefraction, and height and weight measurements were performed for three consecutive years from 2019 to 2021. Basic information about the students, parental myopia and education level, and the students' behavioral habits of using the eyes were collected through questionnaires.

Results: The baseline refractive errors of children in grades 1 ~ 3 in Hubei Province in 2019 were 0.20 (0.11, 0.27)D, -0.14 (-0.21, 0.06)D, and - 0.29 (-0.37, -0.22)D, respectively, and the annual myopia progression was - 0.65 (-0.74, -0.63)D, -0.61 (-0.73, -0.59)D and - 0.59 (-0.64, -0.51)D, with the prevalence of myopia increasing from 17.56%, 20.9%, and 34.08% in 2019 to 24.16%, 32.24%, and 40.37% in 2021 (Χ2 = 63.29, P < 0.001). With growth, children's refractive error moved toward myopia, and the quantity of myopic progression gradually diminished. (F = 291.04, P = 0.027). The myopia progression in boys was less than that in girls in the same grade (P < 0.001). The change in spherical equivalent refraction in myopic children was smaller than that in hyperopic and emmetropic children (F = 59.28, P < 0.001), in which the refractive change in mild myopia, moderate myopia, and high myopia children gradually increased (F = 73.12, P < 0.001). Large baseline refractive error, large body mass index, and high frequency of eating sweets were risk factors for myopia progression, while parental intervention and strong eye-care awareness were protective factors for delaying myopia progression. The nomogram graph predicted the probability of developing high myopia in children and found that baseline refraction had the greatest predictive value.

Conclusion: Myopia progression varies by age, sex, and myopia severity. Baseline refraction is the most important factor in predicting high myopia in childhood. we should focus on children with large baseline refraction or young age of onset of myopia in clinical myopia prevention and control.

Keywords: Children; High myopia; Machine learning; Myopia progression; Refractive status; Risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Prediction of the progression of myopia in children using the machine learning method. (a) ROC curves of refractive change predicted by 5 machine learning methods; (b) calibration curve of the XGBoost model; (c) decision curve of the XGBoost model
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Analysis of the importance of each feature using the XGBoost model
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Beeswarm plots of the XGBoost prediction model of myopia progression
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
A nomogram to predict the probability of high myopia in grade 1 to 3 children in Hubei Province

References

    1. Dolgin E. The myopia boom. Nature. 2015;519(7543):276–8. doi: 10.1038/519276a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morgan IG, French AN, Ashby RS, Guo X, Ding X, He M, Rose KA. The epidemics of myopia: Aetiology and prevention. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018;62:134–49. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.09.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dong L, Kang YK, Li Y, Wei WB, Jonas JB, PREVALENCE AND TIME TRENDS OF MYOPIA IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS IN CHINA A systemic review and Meta-analysis. Retina (Philadelphia Pa) 2020;40(3):399–411. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002590. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agarwal D, Saxena R, Gupta V, Mani K, Dhiman R, Bhardawaj A, Vashist P. Prevalence of myopia in Indian school children: Meta-analysis of last four decades. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(10):e0240750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240750. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kobia-Acquah E, Flitcroft DI, Akowuah PK, Lingham G, Loughman J. Regional variations and temporal trends of childhood myopia prevalence in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022;42(6):1232–52. doi: 10.1111/opo.13035. - DOI - PMC - PubMed