Isolate distribution and antifungal susceptibility of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the national regional medical center of Southwest China for women and children during 2018-2023

Abstract

Background: Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been considered a harmless yeast, but in recent years, increasing evidence has shown that it can cause disease in humans, especially invasive infections in infants/children and vulvovaginal infections in women. This study aimed to investigate the clinical information and antifungal susceptibility of clinical cases with S. cerevisiae and establish a foundation for the prevention and treatment of fungal infections.

Methods: This study was conducted from May 2018 to May 2023 at a national regional medical center in Southwest China for women and children. The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients isolated with S. cerevisiae were collected and analyzed. All the isolates were cultured on Sabouraud medium plates and identified by MALDI-TOF MS. The antifungal susceptibility of S. cerevisiae to 10 agents (amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, micafungin, caspofungin, terbinafine and 5-flucytosine) was determined via the microdilution broth method to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs).

Results: A total of 75 cases of S. cerevisiae isolated from patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC, 44 cases), pneumonia (13 cases), or diarrhea (18 cases) were included after data review. The MICs of voriconazole and flucytosine for S. cerevisiae isolated from different body sites differed, with higher resistance in intestinal isolates. In this study, S. cerevisiae caused VVC, but there was no clear evidence that it was involved in pneumonia or diarrhea. Compared with those of Candida albicans, the primary pathogen of VVC, the MICs of fluconazole (11.96 ± 5.78 µg/mL vs. 67.64 ± 16.62 µg/mL, p = 0.002), itraconazole (0.77 ± 0.19 µg/mL vs. 2.31 ± 0.53 µg/mL, p = 0.008), voriconazole (0.22 ± 0.09 µg/mL vs. 5.02 ± 1.09 µg/mL, p < 0.001), and terbinafine (10.41 ± 0.84 µg/mL vs. 14.93 ± 4.77 µg/mL, p < 0.001) for S. cerevisiae (isolated from the genital tract) were significantly lower, while those of micafungin (0.14 ± 0.01 µg/mL vs. 0.06 ± 0.01 µg/mL, p < 0.001) and caspofungin (0.27 ± 0.04 µg/mL vs. 0.06 ± 0.01 µg/mL, p < 0.001) were significantly greater.

Conclusion: Azoles remain the recommended regimen for S. cerevisiae-related VVC, and the use of amphotericin B vaginal effervescent tablets could be considered for the treatment of azole-resistant isolates. The antifungal susceptibility of S. cerevisiae varies according to the isolated source, and the pathogenicity trend of S. cerevisiae should be studied.

Keywords: Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Antifungal susceptibility; Infection; Rare pathogenic fungi; VVC; Vulvovaginal candidiasis.

Fig. 1

Patient inclusion and exclusion process

Fig. 2

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antifungal agents (mean ± SEM) against 75 S. cerevisiae isolates

Fig. 3

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antifungal agents (mean ± SEM) against pathogenic fungi in vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC). S. cerevisiae vs. C. albicans (n = 44). **: 0.001 ≤ p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001

Fig. 4

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antifungal agents (mean ± SEM) against S. cerevisiae isolates from different sites. *: 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05; **: 0.001 ≤ p < 0.01