3D biplane versus conventional 2D ultrasound imaging for internal jugular vein cannulation
- PMID: 34807306
- DOI: 10.1007/s00134-021-06579-9
3D biplane versus conventional 2D ultrasound imaging for internal jugular vein cannulation
References
-
- Batllori M, Urra M, Uriarte E et al (2016) Randomized comparison of three transducer orientation approaches for ultrasound guided internal jugular venous cannulation. Br J Anaesth 116:370–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev399 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Blaivas M, Adhikari S (2009) An unseen danger: frequency of posterior vessel wall penetration by needles during attempts to place internal jugular vein central catheters using ultrasound guidance. Crit Care Med 37:2345–2349. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c0d9bb - DOI - PubMed
-
- French JLH, Raine-Fenning NJ, Hardman JG, Bedforth NM (2008) Pitfalls of ultrasound guided vascular access: the use of three/four-dimensional ultrasound. Anaesthesia 63:806–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05513.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Panidapu N, Babu S, Koshy T et al (2020) Internal jugular vein cannulation using a 3- dimensional ultrasound probe in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: comparison between biplane view and short-axis view. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2020.08.021 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sauro J, Dumas JS (2009) Comparison of three one-question, post-task usability questionnaires. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings 1599–1608. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518946
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources