Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Apr;21(4):e14608.
doi: 10.1002/alz.14608.

Sex differences in clinical phenotypes of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

Xulin Liu  1   2 Sterre C M de Boer  3   4   5 Kasey Cortez  1 Jackie M Poos  6 Ignacio Illán-Gala  7 Hilary Heuer  8 Leah K Forsberg  9 Kaitlin Casaletto  8 Molly Memel  8 Brian S Appleby  10 Sami Barmada  11 Andrea Bozoki  12 David Clark  13 Yann Cobigo  8 Ryan Darby  14 Bradford C Dickerson  15 Kimiko Domoto-Reilly  16 Douglas R Galasko  17 Daniel H Geschwind  18 Nupur Ghoshal  19 Neill R Graff-Radford  20 Ian M Grant  21 Ging-Yuek Robin Hsiung  22 Lawrence S Honig  23 Edward D Huey  24 David Irwin  25 Kejal Kantarci  9 Gabriel C Léger  17 Irene Litvan  17 Ian R Mackenzie  26 Joseph C Masdeu  27 Mario F Mendez  18 Chiadi U Onyike  28 Belen Pascual  27 Peter Pressman  29 Ece Bayram  29 Eliana Marisa Ramos  18 Erik D Roberson  30 Emily Rogalski  31 Arabella Bouzigues  32 Lucy L Russell  32 Phoebe H Foster  32 Eve Ferry-Bolder  32 Mario Masellis  33 John van Swieten  6 Lize Jiskoot  6 Harro Seelaar  6 Raquel Sanchez-Valle  34 Robert Laforce  35 Caroline Graff  36   37 Daniela Galimberti  38   39 Rik Vandenberghe  40   41 Alexandre de Mendonça  42 Pietro Tiraboschi  43 Isabel Santana  44   45 Alexander Gerhard  46   47   48 Johannes Levin  49   50   51 Sandro Sorbi  52   53 Markus Otto  54 Florence Pasquier  55   56   57 Simon Ducharme  58   59 Chris R Butler  60   61 Isabelle Le Ber  62   63   64 Elizabeth Finger  65 James B Rowe  66 Matthis Synofzik  67   68 Fermin Moreno  69   70 Barbara Borroni  71 Brad F Boeve  9 Adam L Boxer  8 Howie J Rosen  8 Yolande A L Pijnenburg  3 Jonathan D Rohrer  32 Maria Carmela Tartaglia  1   2 ALLFTD Consortium and the GENFI Consortium
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Sex differences in clinical phenotypes of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

Xulin Liu et al. Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: Higher male prevalence in sporadic behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) has been reported. We hypothesized differences in phenotypes between genetic and sporadic bvFTD females resulting in underdiagnosis of sporadic bvFTD females.

Methods: We included genetic and sporadic bvFTD patients from two multicenter cohorts. We compared behavioral and cognitive symptoms, and gray matter volumes, between genetic and sporadic cases in each sex.

Results: Females with sporadic bvFTD showed worse compulsive behavior (p = 0.026) and language impairments (p = 0.024) compared to females with genetic bvFTD (n = 152). Genetic bvFTD females had smaller gray matter volumes than sporadic bvFTD females, particularly in the parietal lobe.

Discussion: Females with sporadic bvFTD exhibit a distinct clinical phenotype compared to females with genetic bvFTD. This difference may explain the discrepancy in prevalence between genetic and sporadic cases, as some females without genetic mutations may be misdiagnosed due to atypical bvFTD symptom presentation.

Highlights: Sex ratio is equal in genetic behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), whereas more males are present in sporadic bvFTD. Distinct neuropsychiatric phenotypes exist between sporadic and genetic bvFTD in females. Phenotype might explain the sex ratio difference between sporadic and genetic cases.

Keywords: behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; clinical diagnosis; diversity; sex difference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Litvan's research is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants: 5U01NS112010/807745, U01NS100610, R25NS098999, U19 AG063911‐1 and 1R21NS114764‐01A1, and 2 P30 AG062429‐06; the Michael J Fox Foundation, Parkinson's Foundation, Roche, AbbVie, Lundbeck, EIP‐Pharma, Alterity, Novartis, and UCB. She is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board for the Rossy PSP Program at the University of Toronto, Aprinoia, Amydis, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory Committee. She receives her salary from the University of California San Diego and as Chief Editor of Frontiers in Neurology. Eliana Marisa Ramos receives research support from the NIH. All other authors have no conflict of interest. Author disclosures are available in the Supporting Information.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Differences in symptoms of frontotemporal dementia diagnostic criteria between genetic and sporadic bvFTD, stratified by sex; and differences in symptoms of frontotemporal dementia diagnostic criteria between females and males, stratified by bvFTD type. Values are z‐scores and higher values represent more severe symptoms. bvFTD, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Differences in cognitive symptoms between genetic and sporadic bvFTD, stratified by sex; and differences in cognitive symptoms between females and males, stratified by bvFTD type. Each cognitive domain was assessed by the composite score of cognitive tests included for that domain as listed in Table 2. Values are z‐scores and higher values represent more severe symptoms. bvFTD, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Differences in symptoms estimated by the NPI‐Q scores in genetic bvFTD and sporadic bvFTD, stratified by sex; and differences in symptoms estimated by the NPI‐Q scores between females and males, stratified by bvFTD type. Values are z‐scores and higher values represent more severe symptoms. bvFTD, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; NPI‐Q, Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Voxel‐based morphometry analysis results of gray matter volume comparison between (A) females with sporadic bvFTD and females with genetic bvFTD (no significant difference was found in males between sporadic and genetic bvFTD); (B) female controls and females with sporadic bvFTD; (C) male controls and males with sporadic bvFTD; (D) female controls and females with genetic bvFTD; (E) male controls and males with genetic bvFTD. Results are showing the regions with significant differences (corrected p < .05). bvFTD, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.

References

    1. Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, et al. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2011;134:2456‐2477. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gorno‐Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, et al. Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology. 2011;76:1006‐1014. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ulugut Erkoyun H, Groot C, Heilbron R, et al. A clinical‐radiological framework of the right temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2020;143:2831‐2843. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Höglinger GU, Respondek G, Stamelou M, et al. Clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy: the movement disorder society criteria. Mov Disord. 2017;32:853‐864. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armstrong MJ, Litvan I, Lang AE, et al. Criteria for the diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration. Neurology. 2013;80:496‐503. - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding