Multilocus analysis of introgression between two sympatric sister species of Drosophila: Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea
- PMID: 15965264
- PMCID: PMC1456511
- DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.033597
Multilocus analysis of introgression between two sympatric sister species of Drosophila: Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea
Abstract
Drosophila yakuba is widely distributed in sub-Saharan Africa, while D. santomea is endemic to the volcanic island of São Tomé in the Atlantic Ocean, 280 km west of Gabon. On São Tomé, D. yakuba is found mainly in open lowland forests, and D. santomea is restricted to the wet misty forests at higher elevations. At intermediate elevations, the species form a hybrid zone where hybrids occur at a frequency of approximately 1%. To determine the extent of gene flow between these species we studied polymorphism and divergence patterns in 29 regions distributed throughout the genome, including mtDNA and three genes on the Y chromosome. This multilocus approach, together with the comparison to the two allopatric species D. mauritiana and D. sechellia, allowed us to distinguish between forces that should affect all genes and forces that should act on some genes (e.g., introgression). Our results show that D. yakuba mtDNA has replaced that of D. santomea and that there is also significant introgression for two nuclear genes, yellow and salr. The majority of genes, however, has remained distinct. These two species therefore do not form a "hybrid swarm" in which much of the genome shows substantial introgression while disruptive selection maintains distinctness for only a few traits (e.g., pigmentation and male genitalia).
Figures



Similar articles
-
Divergence between Drosophila santomea and allopatric or sympatric populations of D. yakuba using paralogous amylase genes and migration scenarios along the Cameroon volcanic line.Mol Ecol. 2001 Mar;10(3):649-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01225.x. Mol Ecol. 2001. PMID: 11298976
-
Genetics of a difference in pigmentation between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea.Evolution. 2002 Nov;56(11):2262-77. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00150.x. Evolution. 2002. PMID: 12487356
-
Sequential adaptive introgression of the mitochondrial genome in Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea.Mol Ecol. 2014 Mar;23(5):1124-36. doi: 10.1111/mec.12678. Mol Ecol. 2014. PMID: 24460929 Free PMC article.
-
Extensive introgression of mitochondrial DNA relative to nuclear genes in the Drosophila yakuba species group.Evolution. 2006 Feb;60(2):292-302. Evolution. 2006. PMID: 16610321
-
The Drosophila mitochondrial genome.Oxf Surv Eukaryot Genes. 1984;1:1-35. Oxf Surv Eukaryot Genes. 1984. PMID: 6400770 Review.
Cited by
-
Principles of genome evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster species group.PLoS Biol. 2007 Jun;5(6):e152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050152. PLoS Biol. 2007. PMID: 17550304 Free PMC article.
-
Parallel faster-X evolution of gene expression and protein sequences in Drosophila: beyond differences in expression properties and protein interactions.PLoS One. 2015 Mar 19;10(3):e0116829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116829. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25789611 Free PMC article.
-
Repeated adaptive introgression at a gene under multiallelic balancing selection.PLoS Genet. 2008 Aug 29;4(8):e1000168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000168. PLoS Genet. 2008. PMID: 18769722 Free PMC article.
-
Reinforcement can overcome gene flow during speciation in Drosophila.Curr Biol. 2010 Dec 21;20(24):2229-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.036. Epub 2010 Dec 2. Curr Biol. 2010. PMID: 21129972 Free PMC article.
-
A selective sweep across species boundaries in Drosophila.Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Sep;30(9):2177-86. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst123. Epub 2013 Jul 3. Mol Biol Evol. 2013. PMID: 23827876 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Arnold, M. L., 1997. Natural Hybridization and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
-
- Ashburner, M., 1989. Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
-
- Ballard, J. W., 2004. Sequential evolution of a symbiont inferred from the host: Wolbachia and Drosophila simulans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: 428–442. - PubMed
-
- Ballard, J. W. O., and M. C. Whitlock, 2004. The incomplete natural history of mitochondria. Mol. Ecol. 13: 729–744. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases