Multilocus analysis of introgression between two sympatric sister species of Drosophila: Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea
- PMID: 15965264
- PMCID: PMC1456511
- DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.033597
Multilocus analysis of introgression between two sympatric sister species of Drosophila: Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea
Abstract
Drosophila yakuba is widely distributed in sub-Saharan Africa, while D. santomea is endemic to the volcanic island of São Tomé in the Atlantic Ocean, 280 km west of Gabon. On São Tomé, D. yakuba is found mainly in open lowland forests, and D. santomea is restricted to the wet misty forests at higher elevations. At intermediate elevations, the species form a hybrid zone where hybrids occur at a frequency of approximately 1%. To determine the extent of gene flow between these species we studied polymorphism and divergence patterns in 29 regions distributed throughout the genome, including mtDNA and three genes on the Y chromosome. This multilocus approach, together with the comparison to the two allopatric species D. mauritiana and D. sechellia, allowed us to distinguish between forces that should affect all genes and forces that should act on some genes (e.g., introgression). Our results show that D. yakuba mtDNA has replaced that of D. santomea and that there is also significant introgression for two nuclear genes, yellow and salr. The majority of genes, however, has remained distinct. These two species therefore do not form a "hybrid swarm" in which much of the genome shows substantial introgression while disruptive selection maintains distinctness for only a few traits (e.g., pigmentation and male genitalia).
Figures



Similar articles
-
Divergence between Drosophila santomea and allopatric or sympatric populations of D. yakuba using paralogous amylase genes and migration scenarios along the Cameroon volcanic line.Mol Ecol. 2001 Mar;10(3):649-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01225.x. Mol Ecol. 2001. PMID: 11298976
-
Genetics of a difference in pigmentation between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea.Evolution. 2002 Nov;56(11):2262-77. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00150.x. Evolution. 2002. PMID: 12487356
-
Sequential adaptive introgression of the mitochondrial genome in Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea.Mol Ecol. 2014 Mar;23(5):1124-36. doi: 10.1111/mec.12678. Mol Ecol. 2014. PMID: 24460929 Free PMC article.
-
Extensive introgression of mitochondrial DNA relative to nuclear genes in the Drosophila yakuba species group.Evolution. 2006 Feb;60(2):292-302. Evolution. 2006. PMID: 16610321
-
The Drosophila mitochondrial genome.Oxf Surv Eukaryot Genes. 1984;1:1-35. Oxf Surv Eukaryot Genes. 1984. PMID: 6400770 Review.
Cited by
-
Support for the Dominance Theory in Drosophila Transcriptomes.Genetics. 2018 Oct;210(2):703-718. doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.301229. Epub 2018 Aug 21. Genetics. 2018. PMID: 30131345 Free PMC article.
-
Conservation Mitonuclear Replacement: Facilitated mitochondrial adaptation for a changing world.Evol Appl. 2024 Mar 10;17(3):e13642. doi: 10.1111/eva.13642. eCollection 2024 Mar. Evol Appl. 2024. PMID: 38468713 Free PMC article.
-
A Major Locus Controls a Genital Shape Difference Involved in Reproductive Isolation Between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea.G3 (Bethesda). 2015 Oct 28;5(12):2893-901. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.023481. G3 (Bethesda). 2015. PMID: 26511499 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular demographic history of the annual sunflowers Helianthus annuus and H. petiolaris--large effective population sizes and rates of long-term gene flow.Evolution. 2008 Aug;62(8):1936-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00415.x. Epub 2008 May 5. Evolution. 2008. PMID: 18462213 Free PMC article.
-
Extreme intraspecific divergence in mitochondrial haplotypes makes the threespine stickleback fish an emerging evolutionary mutant model for mito-nuclear interactions.Front Genet. 2022 Sep 8;13:925786. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.925786. eCollection 2022. Front Genet. 2022. PMID: 36159975 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Arnold, M. L., 1997. Natural Hybridization and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
-
- Ashburner, M., 1989. Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
-
- Ballard, J. W., 2004. Sequential evolution of a symbiont inferred from the host: Wolbachia and Drosophila simulans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: 428–442. - PubMed
-
- Ballard, J. W. O., and M. C. Whitlock, 2004. The incomplete natural history of mitochondria. Mol. Ecol. 13: 729–744. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases