Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 Apr 19;146(4):1328-1341.
doi: 10.1093/brain/awac421.

Randomized trial of bilateral gene therapy injection for m.11778G>A MT-ND4 Leber optic neuropathy

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomized trial of bilateral gene therapy injection for m.11778G>A MT-ND4 Leber optic neuropathy

Nancy J Newman et al. Brain. .

Abstract

Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) is an important example of mitochondrial blindness with the m.11778G>A mutation in the MT-ND4 gene being the most common disease-causing mtDNA variant worldwide. The REFLECT phase 3 pivotal study is a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial investigating the efficacy and safety of bilateral intravitreal injection of lenadogene nolparvovec in patients with a confirmed m.11778G>A mutation, using a recombinant adeno-associated virus vector 2, serotype 2 (rAAV2/2-ND4). The first-affected eye received gene therapy; the fellow (affected/not-yet-affected) eye was randomly injected with gene therapy or placebo. The primary end point was the difference in change from baseline of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes treated with lenadogene nolparvovec versus placebo at 1.5 years post-treatment, expressed in logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (LogMAR). Forty-eight patients were treated bilaterally and 50 unilaterally. At 1.5 years, the change from baseline in BCVA was not statistically different between second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes receiving lenadogene nolparvovec and placebo (primary end point). A statistically significant improvement in BCVA was reported from baseline to 1.5 years in lenadogene nolparvovec-treated eyes: -0.23 LogMAR for the first-affected eyes of bilaterally treated patients (P < 0.01); and -0.15 LogMAR for second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes of bilaterally treated patients and the first-affected eyes of unilaterally treated patients (P < 0.05). The mean improvement in BCVA from nadir to 1.5 years was -0.38 (0.052) LogMAR and -0.33 (0.052) LogMAR in first-affected and second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes treated with lenadogene nolparvovec, respectively (bilateral treatment group). A mean improvement of -0.33 (0.051) LogMAR and -0.26 (0.051) LogMAR was observed in first-affected lenadogene nolparvovec-treated eyes and second-affected/not-yet-affected placebo-treated eyes, respectively (unilateral treatment group). The proportion of patients with one or both eyes on-chart at 1.5 years was 85.4% and 72.0% for bilaterally and unilaterally treated patients, respectively. The gene therapy was well tolerated, with no systemic issues. Intraocular inflammation, which was mostly mild and well controlled with topical corticosteroids, occurred in 70.7% of lenadogene nolparvovec-treated eyes versus 10.2% of placebo-treated eyes. Among eyes treated with lenadogene nolparvovec, there was no difference in the incidence of intraocular inflammation between bilaterally and unilaterally treated patients. Overall, the REFLECT trial demonstrated an improvement of BCVA in LHON eyes carrying the m.11778G>A mtDNA mutation treated with lenadogene nolparvovec or placebo to a degree not reported in natural history studies and supports an improved benefit/risk profile for bilateral injections of lenadogene nolparvovec relative to unilateral injections.

Keywords: NADH dehydrogenase 4; leber hereditary optic neuropathy; lenadogene nolparvovec; mitochondrial DNA; recombinant adeno-associated virus vector 2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

N.J.N. is a consultant for GenSight Biologics, Santhera Pharmaceuticals, and Stealth BioTherapeutics; has received research support from GenSight Biologics and Santhera Pharmaceuticals; served on the Data Safety Monitoring Board for Quark NAION study; and is a medical legal consultant. P.Y.W.M. is a consultant for GenSight Biologics and Stealth BioTherapeutics and has received research support from GenSight Biologics and Santhera Pharmaceuticals. P.S.S. is a consultant for GenSight Biologics, Horizon Therapeutics, Invex Therapeutics, Viridian Therapeutics, and Kriya Therapeutics, and has received research support from Santhera Pharmaceuticals, GenSight Biologics, and Horizon Therapeutics; and is a medical legal consultant. M.L.M. is a consultant for GenSight Biologics and has received research support from GenSight. S.P.D. has been a fee-for-service consultant for GenSight Biologics. B.P.L. is a consultant for GenSight Biologics, 4DMT, AAVantgardeBio, Akouos, Asthena Therapeutics, Bayer, Biogen, GenSight Biologics, IVERIC Bio, MeiraGTx-Jansen Pharmaceuticals, LookoutGTx, Novartis, Opus Genetics, Oxurion, ProQR Therapeutics, Santen, Spark Therapeutics, REGENXBIO, Vedere Bio, ViGeneron, and has received research support from GenSight Biologics, MeiraGTx-Jansen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis and ProQR Therapeutics. V.C. is a consultant for GenSight Biologics, Santhera Pharmaceuticals, and Stealth BioTherapeutics, and has received research support from Santhera Pharmaceuticals and Stealth BioTherapeutics. V.B. is a consultant for GenSight Biologics. C.V.-C. is a consultant for Santhera Pharmaceuticals and GenSight Biologics. R.C.S. is a consultant for GenSight Biologics. A.A.S. is a consultant for Stealth BioTherapeutics. R.B. is a consultant for Horizon Therapeutics, Healthy Directions and Guardion Health Sciences and has received research support from Santhera Pharmaceuticals, Regenera and Quark Pharmaceuticals. E.D.C., M.R. and M.T. are employed by GenSight Biologics, the sponsor of these studies. J-.A.S. is the cofounder and shareholder of GenSight Biologics and the patent coauthor on allotopic transport.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
REFLECT study design. Asterisk indicates the allocated study treatment was administered on the same day (Day 0) or on two consecutive days (Day −1 and Day 0) at the investigator’s discretion. In all cases, the initial treatment administration had to be performed the day following the Inclusion visit; thus, the Inclusion visit was performed on Day −1 if eyes were treated on the same day, or on Day −2 if eyes were treated on 2 consecutive days. #Participation in the long-term follow-up phase of the study up to Year 5 was/will be sought at the Year 2 visit with a separate informed consent. For patients who did not consent to participate in the long-term follow-up period, the end-of-study visit was the Year 2 visit. D = day; W = week; Y = year.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Participants flow at the 1.5 year interim analysis. TARM1: First-affected eye and second-affected/not-yet-affected eye administered lenadogene nolparvovec. TARM2: First-affected eye administered lenadogene nolparvovec, second-affected/not-yet-affected eye administered placebo. *Taking in account reassigned visit at Year 1.5 as per the rules described in the ‘Statistical analyses’ section.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time course of LS mean change in LogMAR BCVA from baseline to 1.5 years for first-affected and second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes—estimated by ANCOVA model (ITT population). An ANCOVA model (considering both eyes of each patient) was used to model the change from baseline to time point of interest for LogMAR BCVA, using baseline LogMAR as covariate and treatment as fixed effect. Data are shown as LS mean.

References

    1. Carelli V, Carbonelli M, de Coo IF, et al. . International consensus statement on the clinical and therapeutic management of Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. J Neuroophthalmol. 2017;37:371–381. - PubMed
    1. Newman NJ, Yu-Wai-Man P, Biousse V, Carelli V. Understanding the molecular basis and pathogenesis of hereditary optic neuropathies: Towards improved diagnosis and management. Lancet Neurology. 2023;22:172–188. - PubMed
    1. Newman NJ, Carelli V, Taiel M, Yu-Wai-Man P. Visual outcomes in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy patients with the m.11778G>A (MTND4) mitochondrial DNA mutation. J Neuro-Ophthalmol. 2020;40:547–557. - PubMed
    1. Yu-Wai-Man P, Votruba M, Burté F, La Morgia C, Barboni P, Carelli V. A neurodegenerative perspective on mitochondrial optic neuropathies. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 2016;132:789–806. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yu-Wai-Man P, Griffiths PG, Chinnery PF. Mitochondrial optic neuropathies—Disease mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2011;30:81–114. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Supplementary concepts