Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Nov-Dec;39(6):356-364.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.06.008. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

Evaluation of the degree of implementation of zero projects in critical care units of Galicia (Spain) through internal audits

Collaborators, Affiliations
Observational Study

Evaluation of the degree of implementation of zero projects in critical care units of Galicia (Spain) through internal audits

I Losada-Castillo et al. J Healthc Qual Res. 2024 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the implementation of Zero Projects in Critical Care Units (CCUs) through Internal Audits (IA).

Materials and methods: Design: Real-time observational safety analysis. A questionnaire was developed with defined items to ensure objectivity. After IAs, a survey was conducted with the auditors.

Scope: 11 CCUs in hospitals of the Servizo Galego de Saúde and Ribera-POVISA.

Patients or participants: 24 auditors in 9 teams composed of medical, nursing, and quality personnel from health areas and 34 patients were assessed.

Main variables of interest: Compliance with the quality standard (≥60% of items), strengths, areas for improvement, auditor's interest in IA, conformity with the organization and items.

Results: 100% CCUs met the quality standard. 18.03% of items were fulfilled by all CCUs. Strengths: staff motivation, positive reception of auditors, and use of computer tools in some CCUs. Areas for improvement: deficit of automatic systems for controlling endotracheal tube cuff pressure (compliance rate in 9.1% of CCUs), training needs, communication issues, and not using checklists (45.5% of the reports). Auditors found IA very interesting, and 19% suggested improving organization and items.

Conclusions: All CCUs met the previously agreed-upon quality standard. Numerous improvement opportunities were identified and communicated to the audited CCUs. For greater homogeneity and objectivity, a review of previously agreed items and definitions is required.

Keywords: Auditorías; Clinical audit; Critical care; Cuidados críticos; Cultura de seguridad; Paquetes de medidas; Patient care bundles; Proyectos zero; Safety culture; Zero projects.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources