A 10-year review of surgical management of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans
- PMID: 32599647
- DOI: 10.1111/bjd.19346
A 10-year review of surgical management of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans
Abstract
Background: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare skin cancer. Standard treatment in the UK is either wide local excision (WLE) or Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). It is unclear which approach has the lower recurrence rate.
Objectives: We undertook a retrospective comparative review of surgical management of DFSP in the UK National Health Service in order to define (i) current surgical practice for primary and recurrent DFSP, (ii) local recurrence rates for primary DFSP and (iii) survival outcomes for DFSP.
Methods: A retrospective clinical case-note review of patients with histologically confirmed DFSP (January 2004 to December 2013) who have undergone surgical treatment.
Results: The surgical management of 483 primary and 64 recurrent DFSP in 11 plastic surgery and 15 dermatology departments was analysed. Almost 75% of primary DFSP (n = 362) were treated with WLE and 20% (n = 97) with MMS. For recurrent DFSP, 69% (n = 44) and 23% (n = 15) of patients underwent WLE and MMS, respectively. Recurrent primary DFSP occurred in six patients after WLE and none after MMS. The median follow-up time was 25·5 months (interquartile range 6·8-45·1) for new and 19·8 (IQR 4·5-44·5) for recurrent DFSP [Correction added on 1 Feb 2021, after first online publication: 4.8 years (interquartile range 3.5-5.8) was incorrect], with eight reported deaths during the follow-up analysis period (one confirmed to be DFSP related).
Conclusions: WLE was the most common surgical modality used to treat DFSP across the UK. The local recurrence rate was very low, occurring only after WLE. Although a prospective randomized controlled trial may provide more definitive outcomes, in the absence of a clearly superior surgical modality, treatment decisions should be based on patient preference, clinical expertise and cost.
© 2020 British Association of Dermatologists.
Comment in
-
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: slowly gathering evidence for optimal treatment of a slow-growing tumour.Br J Dermatol. 2021 Apr;184(4):595. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19567. Epub 2020 Nov 2. Br J Dermatol. 2021. PMID: 33140441 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kreicher KL, Kurlander DE, Gittleman HR et al. Incidence and survival of primary dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans in the United States. Dermatol Surg 2016; 42 (Suppl. 1):S24-31.
-
- Akram J, Wooler G, Lock-Andersen J. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: clinical series, national Danish incidence data and suggested guidelines. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2014; 48:67-73.
-
- Criscione VD, Weinstock MA. Descriptive epidemiology of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans in the United States, 1973 to 2002. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 56:968-73.
-
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service. Non-melanoma skin cancer in England, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Ireland. Available at: http://www.ncin.org.uk/publications/data_briefings/non_melanoma_skin_can... (last accessed 3 July 2020).
-
- Ratner D, Thomas CO, Johnson TM et al. Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Results of a multiinstitutional series with an analysis of the extent of microscopic spread. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 37:600-13.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
