Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2011 Dec;4(6):647-54.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.111.960583. Epub 2011 Oct 9.

Post-genomic update on a classical candidate gene for coronary artery disease: ESR1

Collaborators, Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Post-genomic update on a classical candidate gene for coronary artery disease: ESR1

Gavin Lucas et al. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Background: After age, sex is the most important risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). The mechanism through which women are protected from CAD is still largely unknown, but the observed sex difference suggests the involvement of the reproductive steroid hormone signaling system. Genetic association studies of the gene-encoding Estrogen Receptor α (ESR1) have shown conflicting results, although only a limited range of variation in the gene has been investigated.

Methods and results: We exploited information made available by advanced new methods and resources in complex disease genetics to revisit the question of ESR1's role in risk of CAD. We performed a meta-analysis of 14 genome-wide association studies (CARDIoGRAM discovery analysis, N=≈87,000) to search for population-wide and sex-specific associations between CAD risk and common genetic variants throughout the coding, noncoding, and flanking regions of ESR1. In addition to samples from the MIGen (N=≈6000), WTCCC (N=≈7400), and Framingham (N=≈3700) studies, we extended this search to a larger number of common and uncommon variants by imputation into a panel of haplotypes constructed using data from the 1000 Genomes Project. Despite the widespread expression of ERα in vascular tissues, we found no evidence for involvement of common or low-frequency genetic variation throughout the ESR1 gene in modifying risk of CAD, either in the general population or as a function of sex.

Conclusions: We suggest that future research on the genetic basis of sex-related differences in CAD risk should initially prioritize other genes in the reproductive steroid hormone biosynthesis system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Regional association results for the ESR1 gene region. Results of CARDIoGRAM global and gender-stratified meta-analysis and fine mapping analysis for a region of chromosome 6 containing the coding and non-coding exons of ESR1 and 50kb of the upstream and downstream flanking regions (−log10(p-value) shown as black points). Results shown are for a fixed or random effects meta-analysis in the absence or presence of between-study heterogeneity, respectively (see Methods). The position of the ESR1 gene is shown at the bottom of the plot (dotted line), with coding and non-coding exons shown as long and short vertical bars, respectively. Regional recombination rate (HapMap II) is shown as a grey line in plot A. A). Regional association plot of global meta-analysis results from the CARDIoGRAM study. B). Regional association plot of gender-stratified meta-analysis results from the CARDIoGRAM study. Results for the test for SNP-gender interaction are shown in the top panel; results for the association test in females and males are shown in the middle and bottom panels, respectively. C). Regional association plot of results from fine-mapping meta-analysis (MIGen, WTCCC and Framingham studies). Results for SNPs that were previously analyzed in the CARDIoGRAM study are shown as black points (i.e. SNPs that were directly genotyped or imputed using a reference panel of haplotypes generated from the Phase II HapMap CEU genotypes). Results for additional SNPs that were imputed using a reference panel of haplotypes generated using data from the 1000 Genomes project (August 2010 release) are shown as grey points.

References

    1. Tunstall-Pedoe H, Kuulasmaa K, Mahonen M, Tolonen H, Ruokokoski E, Amouyel P. Contribution of trends in survival and coronary-event rates to changes in coronary heart disease mortality: 10-year results from 37 WHO MONICA project populations. Monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease. Lancet. 1999;353:1547–1557. - PubMed
    1. Barrett-Connor E, Grady D. Hormone replacement therapy, heart disease, and other considerations. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:55–72. - PubMed
    1. Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Manson JE, Joffe M, Rosner B, Fuchs C, Hankinson SE, Hunter DJ, Hennekens CH, Speizer FE. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1769–1775. - PubMed
    1. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, Jackson RD, Beresford SA, Howard BV, Johnson KC, Kotchen JM, Ockene J. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:321–333. - PubMed
    1. Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T, Furberg C, Herrington D, Riggs B, Vittinghoff E. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. JAMA. 1998;280:605–613. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances