Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;71(9):1553-1570.
doi: 10.1002/art.40906. Epub 2019 Aug 12.

Phenotypes Determined by Cluster Analysis and Their Survival in the Prospective European Scleroderma Trials and Research Cohort of Patients With Systemic Sclerosis

Collaborators, Affiliations

Phenotypes Determined by Cluster Analysis and Their Survival in the Prospective European Scleroderma Trials and Research Cohort of Patients With Systemic Sclerosis

Vincent Sobanski et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a heterogeneous connective tissue disease that is typically subdivided into limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) and diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) depending on the extent of skin involvement. This subclassification may not capture the entire variability of clinical phenotypes. The European Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) database includes data on a prospective cohort of SSc patients from 122 European referral centers. This study was undertaken to perform a cluster analysis of EUSTAR data to distinguish and characterize homogeneous phenotypes without any a priori assumptions, and to examine survival among the clusters obtained.

Methods: A total of 11,318 patients were registered in the EUSTAR database, and 6,927 were included in the study. Twenty-four clinical and serologic variables were used for clustering.

Results: Clustering analyses provided a first delineation of 2 clusters showing moderate stability. In an exploratory attempt, we further characterized 6 homogeneous groups that differed with regard to their clinical features, autoantibody profile, and mortality. Some groups resembled usual dcSSc or lcSSc prototypes, but others exhibited unique features, such as a majority of lcSSc patients with a high rate of visceral damage and antitopoisomerase antibodies. Prognosis varied among groups and the presence of organ damage markedly impacted survival regardless of cutaneous involvement.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that restricting subsets of SSc patients to only those based on cutaneous involvement may not capture the complete heterogeneity of the disease. Organ damage and antibody profile should be taken into consideration when individuating homogeneous groups of patients with a distinct prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A, Dendrogram of the 6,927 patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) included in the cluster analysis. The length of the vertical lines represents the degree of similarity between patients. Patients were divided into 2 clusters (cluster A and B) and into 6 clusters (clusters 1–6). B, Heatmap showing the clinical characteristics in each cluster. dcSSc = diffuse cutaneous SSc; CK = creatine kinase; PH = pulmonary hypertension; CRP = C‐reactive protein; ACA = anticentromere antibody; anti–topo I = anti–topoisomerase I.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A, Main characteristics of the 2 clusters (cluster A and cluster B) of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). B, Left, Proportions of each cluster with the main clinical characteristics of diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc), restrictive defect, and suspected pulmonary hypertension (PH) on echocardiography (echo). Right, Peak modified Rodnan skin thickness score (MRSS), mortality (per 1,000 patient‐years [py]), and percentages of patients with anticentromere antibodies (ACAs) and anti–topoisomerase I (anti–topo I) antibodies in each cluster. C, Kaplan‐Meier survival curves for the 2 clusters. D, Forest plot showing mortality hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the 2 clusters. Broken line shows the hazard ratio for the reference group. Green symbols represent cluster A; orange symbols represent cluster B. DU = digital ulcer; ILD = interstitial lung disease.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A, Main characteristics of the 6 clusters (clusters 1–6) of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). B, Left, Proportions of each cluster with the main clinical characteristics of diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc), restrictive defect, and suspected pulmonary hypertension (PH) on echocardiography (echo). Right, Peak modified Rodnan skin thickness score (MRSS), mortality (per 1,000 patient‐years [py]), and percentages of patients with anticentromere antibodies (ACAs) and anti–topoisomerase I (anti–topo I) antibodies in each cluster. C, Kaplan‐Meier survival curves for the 6 clusters. D, Forest plot showing mortality hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the 6 clusters. Broken line shows the hazard ratio for the reference group. Colors represent the different clusters as indicated in C. GI = gastrointestinal; ILD = interstitial lung disease; DL co = diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide; DU = digital ulcer.

Comment in

References

    1. Van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2013;65:2737–47. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnson SR, Soowamber ML, Fransen J, Khanna D, Van Den Hoogen F, Baron M, et al. There is a need for new systemic sclerosis subset criteria: a content analytic approach. Scand J Rheumatol 2018;47:62–70. - PubMed
    1. Wollheim FA. Classification of systemic sclerosis: visions and reality. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005;44:1212–6. - PubMed
    1. LeRoy EC, Black C, Fleischmajer R, Jablonska S, Krieg T, Medsger TA Jr, et al. Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): classification, subsets and pathogenesis. J Rheumatol 1988;15:202–5. - PubMed
    1. Komócsi A, Vorobcsuk A, Faludi R, Pintér T, Lenkey Z, Költo G, et al. The impact of cardiopulmonary manifestations on the mortality of SSc: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational studies. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;51:1027–36. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms