Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr 11;484(7393):251-5.
doi: 10.1038/nature10985.

Genome-wide protein-DNA binding dynamics suggest a molecular clutch for transcription factor function

Affiliations

Genome-wide protein-DNA binding dynamics suggest a molecular clutch for transcription factor function

Colin R Lickwar et al. Nature. .

Abstract

Dynamic access to genetic information is central to organismal development and environmental response. Consequently, genomic processes must be regulated by mechanisms that alter genome function relatively rapidly. Conventional chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments measure transcription factor occupancy, but give no indication of kinetics and are poor predictors of transcription factor function at a given locus. To measure transcription-factor-binding dynamics across the genome, we performed competition ChIP (refs 6, 7) with a sequence-specific Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcription factor, Rap1 (ref. 8). Rap1-binding dynamics and Rap1 occupancy were only weakly correlated (R(2) = 0.14), but binding dynamics were more strongly linked to function than occupancy. Long Rap1 residence was coupled to transcriptional activation, whereas fast binding turnover, which we refer to as 'treadmilling', was linked to low transcriptional output. Thus, DNA-binding events that seem identical by conventional ChIP may have different underlying modes of interaction that lead to opposing functional outcomes. We propose that transcription factor binding turnover is a major point of regulation in determining the functional consequences of transcription factor binding, and is mediated mainly by control of competition between transcription factors and nucleosomes. Our model predicts a clutch-like mechanism that rapidly engages a treadmilling transcription factor into a stable binding state, or vice versa, to modulate transcription factor function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Development of transcription factor competition-ChIP in yeast
(a) Schematic of Rap1 competition-ChIP yeast strain. (b) Growth comparison of competition yeast strain to wild-type in inducing (2% Galactose) and non-inducing (2% Dextrose) conditions. (c) Western blot using an antibody against Rap1 (y-300). Strains containing only a Rap1-Myc or only Rap1-Flag copy are shown to the right to indicate the size of isoform-specific bands. Actin loading control below. (d) To estimate the dynamics of induction, the ratio of induced Rap1-Myc and constitutive Rap1-Flag protein is plotted. Data is from two technical replicates of two independent time course replicates. Error bars represent standard error.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Rap1-bound sites exhibit distinct replacement dynamics
(a) A Rap1 turnover experiment over a 30-kb region of chromosome II. Rap1 motifs and peaks are indicated. (b) Average log2 Myc/Flag values for all Rap1 targets (red) increase relative to non-Rap1 targets (blue). (c) Rap1-Myc competes with Rap1-Flag for binding. Average single channel intensity for Rap1-Myc and Rap1-Flag for a single probe (id:CHR15FS000978891) in the promoter of TYE7/YOR344C shows the increase in Rap1-Myc is coincident with the loss of Rap1-Flag. (d) Total Rap1 occupancy does not change during the time-course. Average total Rap1 occupancy (log2 Rap1 IP (y-300)/input z-score) at Rap1 targets at time 0 versus 60 minutes is plotted. (e) Average log2 Myc/Flag values for the promoter of ribosomal protein gene RPL29B (red points). The model fit for the residence time parameter that best fits this data is shown (black line). (f) Colorimetric representation of log2 Myc/Flag values for all 465 Rap1 targets, sorted by the initial (normalized) log2 Myc/Flag value. (g) For each site in (f), the log2 Myc/Flag value predicted by our residence model based on the calculated residence time. (h) Rap1 occupancy (time 0 z-score) vs. Rap1 residence for 465 Rap1 targets (R2= 0.14, 0.37 spearman rank correlation).
Figure 3
Figure 3. RNA Pol II recruitment, mRNA production, and histone acetyltransferase recruitment is associated with long Rap1 residence
(a-d) In the left panel, Rap1 residence time is plotted on the x-axis. In the right panel, Rap1 occupancy is plotted on the x-axis. In both panels, the following is plotted on the y-axis: (a) RNA Pol II occupancy, (b) mRNA/hr, (c) mRNA levels at time 0 and (d) Histone acetyltransferase Esa1 occupancy z-scores. rs is the Spearman correlation value. (e) Colorimetric representation of Spearman rank correlation between various genomic data sets and Rap1 occupancy (left) and Rap1 residence (right), ordered by the magnitude of the absolute difference between the oc cupancy and residence correlations for each comparison. WCE; Whole cell extract, PBM; Protein binding microarray. Telomeric targets excluded from analysis (Supplemental Text).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Evidence for competition between Rap1 and nucleosomes
(a) Colorimetric representation of in vivo nucleosome occupancy centered on Rap1 binding motifs. Loci ordered by Rap1 residence time (top) or Rap1 occupancy (bottom). The total number of Rap1 targets in each group is shown in parentheses. To the right are plots of the average nucleosome occupancy for each group centered on the Rap1 motif. Targets with multiple Rap1 motifs are represented by one randomly chosen motif. (b) Same as (a) for in vitro nucleosome occupancy. (c) Histone H3 turnover vs. Rap1 residence for ribosomal protein genes (red) and other targets (blue). (d) The number of Rap1-nucleosome interactions detected within each Rap1 target peak boundary on a log10 scale. (e) Relative change in nucleosome occupancy following Rap1 depletion centered on Rap1 motifs grouped residence. A value of zero represents no relative change in nucleosome occupancy. (f) in vitro Rap1 affinity for its cognate target as measured by Protein Binding Microarray (PBM) compared to Rap1 residence. Colors represent histone H4 occupancy z-scores (> −1.5 purple (high),< −1.5 green (low). (g) Top position weight matrix motifs discovered for Rap1 targets grouped by residence. The number of targets for each group is in parentheses. (h) All motifs from the top position weight matrix for each residence group are colored by their A/T (purple) or G/C (green) content at each motif base position. (i) Percentage of A/T content for the entire motif (blue), AA/AT/TA/TT at the 12th and 13th motif position (green), TT at the 12th and 13th position (purple) and GG/GC/CG/CC at the 12th and 13th position (red) for Rap1 targets grouped by residence and telomeric regions.

Comment in

References

    1. Mueller F, Wach P, McNally JG. Evidence for a common mode of transcription factor interaction with chromatin as revealed by improved quantitative fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Biophys J. 2008;94:3323–39. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yao J, Munson KM, Webb WW, Lis JT. Dynamics of heat shock factor association with native gene loci in living cells. Nature. 2006;442:1050–1053. - PubMed
    1. Stavreva DA, Muller WG, Hager GL, Smith CL, McNally JG. Rapid glucocorticoid receptor exchange at a promoter is coupled to transcription and regulated by chaperones and proteasomes. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2004;24:2682–97. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karpova TS, et al. Concurrent Fast and Slow Cycling of a Transcriptional Activator at an Endogenous Promoter. Science. 2008;319:466–469. - PubMed
    1. MacArthur S, et al. Developmental roles of 21 Drosophila transcription factors are determined by quantitative differences in binding to an overlapping set of thousands of genomic regions. Genome biology. 2009;10:R80. - PMC - PubMed

Methods references

    1. Sikorski RS, Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989;122:19–27. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Janke C, et al. A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes. Yeast. 2004;21:947–62. - PubMed
    1. Gelbart ME, Rechsteiner T, Richmond TJ, Tsukiyama T. Interactions of Isw2 chromatin remodeling complex with nucleosomal arrays: analyses using recombinant yeast histones and immobilized templates. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2001;21:2098–106. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoffman CS. Preparation of yeast DNA, RNA, and proteins. In: Ausubel FM, et al., editors. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Vol. 2. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; New York, NY: 1997. pp. 13.11.1–13.11.4. - PubMed
    1. Cesaroni M, Cittaro D, Brozzi A, Pelicci PG, Luzi L. CARPET: a web-based package for the analysis of ChIP-chip and expression tiling data. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:2918–20. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms