Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb;29(1):65-87.
doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2012.00418.x. Epub 2012 Aug 17.

Plastid genomes and deep relationships among the commelinid monocot angiosperms

Affiliations
Free article

Plastid genomes and deep relationships among the commelinid monocot angiosperms

Craig F Barrett et al. Cladistics. 2013 Feb.
Free article

Abstract

The commelinid monocots comprise the orders Arecales (A), Commelinales (C), Poales sensu Angiosperm Phylogeny Group III (APGIII) (P), Zingiberales (Z), plus the unplaced family Dasypogonaceae (D), collectively containing numerous economically and ecologically important species and encompassing enormous morphological diversity. Commelinids are supported as monophyletic based on anatomy and molecular data; however, relationships among major commelinid groupings conflict among previous studies, representing a long-standing problem in monocot systematics, with major implications for interpretations of character evolution. In more recent analyses, with whole-plastome sampling largely focused on Poales, areas of conflict remain, suggesting the need for closer investigation of relationships and support. Here, we increased sampling of plastomes among non-Poalean commelinid orders to investigate deep nodal support. Analysis of 83 plastid genes recovered relationships as ((A, D) (ZC, P)) with robust support, regardless of reconstruction method (parsimony/likelihood). However, conflict among genes was evident when grouped by genomic region. Cumulative analyses of genes ranked by decreasing numbers of informative characters indicated continued fluctuation in support, even as small genes were added to a nearly complete matrix, contrary to the expected pattern of stabilization in support. Topology tests among major commelinid groups suggested that the data were not powerful enough to reject all alternatives. This study provides clues to the limits of the plastid genome for resolving deep relationships among the commelinid monocots.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 161, 105-121.
    1. Ansorge, W.J., 2009. Next-generation DNA sequencing techniques. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 195-203.
    1. Asano, T., Tsudzuki, T., Takahashi, S., Shimada, H., Kadowski, K., 2004. Complete nucleotide sequence of the sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) chloroplast genome: a comparative analysis of four monocot chloroplast genomes. DNA Res. 11, 93-99.
    1. Baker, W.J., Savolainen, V., Asmussen-Lange, C.B., Chase, M.W., Dransfield, J., Forest, F., Harley, M.M., Uhl, N.W., Wilkinson, M., 2009. Complete generic-level phylogenetic analyses of palms (Arecaceae) with comparisons of supertree and supermatrix approaches. Syst. Biol. 58, 240-256.
    1. Baurain, D., Philippe, H., 2010. Current approaches to phylogenomic reconstruction. In: Caetano-Anolles, G. (Ed), Evolutionary Genomics and Systems Biology. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 17-41.

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources