Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Oct 1;36(37):2500-7.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv292. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

Intra-operative defibrillation testing and clinical shock efficacy in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: the NORDIC ICD randomized clinical trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Intra-operative defibrillation testing and clinical shock efficacy in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: the NORDIC ICD randomized clinical trial

Dietmar Bänsch et al. Eur Heart J. .

Abstract

Aims: This trial was designed to test the hypothesis that shock efficacy during follow-up is not impaired in patients implanted without defibrillation (DF) testing during first implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation.

Methods and results: Between February 2011 and July 2013, 1077 patients were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to first time ICD implantation with (n = 540) or without (n = 537) DF testing. The intra-operative DF testing was standardized across all participating centres, and all ICD shocks were programmed to 40 J irrespective of DF test results. The primary end point was the average first shock efficacy (FSE) for all true ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation (VT/VF) episodes during follow-up. The secondary end points included procedural data, serious adverse events, and mortality. During a median follow-up of 22.8 months, the model-based FSE was found to be non-inferior in patients with an ICD implanted without a DF test, with a difference in FSE of 3.0% in favour of the no DF test [confidence interval (CI) -3.0 to 9.0%, Pnon-inferiority <0.001 for the pre-defined non-inferiority margin of -10%). A total of 112 procedure-related serious adverse events occurred within 30 days in 94 patients (17.6%) tested compared with 89 events in 74 patients (13.9%) not tested (P = 0.095).

Conclusion: Defibrillation efficacy during follow-up is not inferior in patients with a 40 J ICD implanted without DF testing. Defibrillation testing during first time ICD implantation should no longer be recommended for routine left-sided ICD implantation.

Keywords: Defibrillation testing; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flow diagram. *With at least one delivered appropriate ICD shock. ITT, full analysis set (all patients as randomized); EFS, evaluated for safety set (all patients randomized, who had a successful primary ICD implantation); PPS, per protocol set (all patients randomized, who are compliant with the study protocol); P-PPS, all randomized patients at least one day at risk before protocol deviation (includes all sufficiently documented shocked episodes until time point of protocol deviation).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Primary outcome in the per protocol population.

Comment in

References

    1. Russo AM, Chung MK. Is defribrillation testing necessary? Cardiol Clin 2014;32:211–224. - PubMed
    1. Pires LA, Johnson KM. Intraoperative testing of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: how much is enough? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006;17:140–145. - PubMed
    1. Christ G, Becker R, Voss F, Kelemen K, Senges-Becker J, Hauck M, Schoels W, Bald I, Katus H, Bauer A. Indications for predismissal testing with arrhythmia-induction in patients receiving an implatable cardioverter defibrillator. Clin Res Cardiol 2007;96:613–620. - PubMed
    1. Brignole M, Raciti G, Bongiorni MG, De Martino G, Favale S, Gasparini M, Luise R, Occhetta E, Proclemer A. Defibrillation testing at the time of implantation of cardioverter defibrillator in the clinical practice: a nation-wide survey. Europace 2007;9:540–543. - PubMed
    1. Healey JS, Dorian P, Mitchell LB, Talajic M, Philippon F, Simpson C, Yee R, Morillo CA, Lamy A, Basta M, Birnie DH, Wang X, Nair GM, Crystal E, Kerr CR, Connolly SJ, CREDIT Investigators. Canadian Registry of ICD Implant Testing procedures (CREDIT): current practice, risks, and costs of intraoperative defibrillation testing. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2010;21:177–182. - PubMed

Publication types