Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep;125(10):1294-1302.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15122. Epub 2018 Feb 22.

Obstetrical providers' preferred mode of delivery and attitude towards non-medically indicated caesarean sections: a cross-sectional study

J C Rivo  1 , M Amyx  2   3 , V Pingray  3 , R A Casale  4 , A E Fiorillo  5 , H B Krupitzki  5 , J D Malamud  6 , M Mendilaharzu  7 , M L Medina  7 , A B Del Pino  6 , L Ribola  4 , J A Schvartzman  5 , G M Tartalo  7 , M Trasmonte  4 , S Varela  4 , F Althabe  3 , J M Belizán  3 ; Feasibility of ‘Mode of Delivery Trial’ Study Group
Collaborators, Affiliations

Obstetrical providers' preferred mode of delivery and attitude towards non-medically indicated caesarean sections: a cross-sectional study

J C Rivo et al. BJOG. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To describe obstetrical providers' delivery preferences and attitudes towards caesarean section without medical indication, including on maternal request, and to examine the association between provider characteristics and preferences/attitudes.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Two public and two private hospitals in Argentina.

Population: Obstetrician-gynaecologists and midwives who provide prenatal care and/or labour/delivery services.

Methods: Providers in hospitals with at least 1000 births per year completed a self-administered, anonymous survey.

Main outcome measures: Provider delivery preference for low-risk women, perception of women's preferred delivery method, support for a woman's right to choose her delivery method and willingness to perform caesarean section on maternal request.

Results: 168 providers participated (89.8% coverage rate). Providers (93.2%) preferred a vaginal delivery for their patients in the absence of a medical indication for caesarean section. Whereas 74.4% of providers supported their patient's right to choose a delivery method in the absence of a medical indication for caesarean section and 66.7% would perform a caesarean section upon maternal request, only 30.4% would consider a non-medically indicated caesarean section for their own personal delivery or that of their partner. In multivariate adjusted analysis, providers in the private sector [odds ratio (OR) 4.70, 95% CI 1.19-18.62] and obstetrician-gynaecologists (OR 4.37, 95% CI 1.58-12.09) were more willing than either providers working in the public/both settings or midwives to perform a caesarean section on maternal request.

Conclusions: Despite the ethical debate surrounding non-medically indicated caesarean sections, we observe very high levels of support, especially by providers in the private sector and obstetrician-gynaecologists, as aligned with the high caesarean section rates in Argentina.

Tweetable abstract: Non-medically indicated c-section? 74% of sampled Argentine OB providers support women's right to choose.

Keywords: caesarean section; cesarean section/epidemiology; cesarean section/utilisation; maternal request; non-medically indicated caesarean section; obstetricians’ attitude.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of interests

None declared. Completed disclosure of interests form available to view online as supporting information.

Comment in

References

    1. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0148343. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Althabe F, Belizán JM. Rising trend in non-indicated caesarean deliveries: can the trend be reversed? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2017;31:263–6. - PubMed
    1. Vogel JP, Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3:e260–70. - PubMed
    1. Villar J, Valladares J, Wojdyla D, Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco A, et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. The Lancet. 2006;367:1819–29. - PubMed
    1. NIH. NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2006;23:1–29. - PubMed