Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Dec 1;212(11):1692-700.
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv252. Epub 2015 Apr 24.

Serum Procalcitonin Measurement and Viral Testing to Guide Antibiotic Use for Respiratory Infections in Hospitalized Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Serum Procalcitonin Measurement and Viral Testing to Guide Antibiotic Use for Respiratory Infections in Hospitalized Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Angela R Branche et al. J Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Viral lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI) frequently causes adult hospitalization and is linked to antibiotic overuse. European studies suggest that the serum procalcitonin (PCT) level may be used to guide antibiotic therapy. We conducted a trial assessing the feasibility of using PCT algorithms with viral testing to guide antibiotic use in a US hospital.

Methods: Three hundred patients hospitalized with nonpneumonic LRTI during October 2013-April 2014 were randomly assigned at a ratio of 1:1 to receive standard care or PCT-guided care and viral PCR testing. The primary outcome was antibiotic exposure, and safety was assessed at 1 and 3 months.

Results: Among the 151 patients in the intervention group, viruses were identified in 42% (63), and 83% (126) had PCT values of <0.25 µg/mL. There were no significant differences in antibiotic use or adverse events between intervention patients and those in the nonintervention group. Subgroup analyses revealed fewer subjects with positive results of viral testing and low PCT values who were discharged receiving antibiotics (20% vs 45%; P = .002) and shorter antibiotic durations among algorithm-adherent intervention patients versus nonintervention patients (2.0 vs 4.0 days; P = .004). Compared with historical controls (from 2008-2011), antibiotic duration in nonintervention patients decreased by 2 days (6.0 vs 4.0 days; P < .001), suggesting a study effect.

Conclusions: Although antibiotic use was similar in the 2 arms, subgroup analyses of intervention patients suggest that physicians responded to viral and biomarker data. These data can inform the design of future US studies.

Clinical trials registration: NCT01907659.

Keywords: antibiotic use; procalcitonin; respiratory infections; viral testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow of patients through the study. Reasons for exclusion from the study included intensive care unit (ICU) stay, antibiotic use for >24 hours prior to enrollment, active chemotherapy, conditions known to increase procalcitonin level (eg, renal failure, pancreatitis, and trauma), definite infiltrate on a chest radiograph (according to radiology report), >15% bands on a peripheral blood smear, and a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of <90 mm Hg at enrollment. Abbreviation: PCT, procalcitonin.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Time series plot of total antibiotic days in intervention and nonintervention patients and a subgroup analysis of virus-positive intervention subjects with low procalcitonin (PCT) levels, compared with the nonintervention arm. Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Provider response to the procalcitonin (PCT)–guided treatment algorithm. A circle represents an individual PCT value for each intervention study subject. The horizontal bar represents the threshold for PCT values (0.24 ng/mL), which defines levels as either low or high. The algorithm discourages antibiotic use below this threshold and recommends antibiotics for values above this level. Results are segregated by provider response to the algorithm and are designated as “algorithm followed” and “algorithm rejected.”

Comment in

  • Where Do We Go From Here?
    Gilbert DN. Gilbert DN. J Infect Dis. 2015 Dec 1;212(11):1687-9. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv253. Epub 2015 Apr 24. J Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 25910631 No abstract available.

References

    1. Widmer K, Zhu Y, Williams JV, Griffin MR, Edwards KM, Talbot HK. Rates of hospitalizations for respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus, and influenza virus in older adults. J Infect Dis 2012; 206:56–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Falsey AR, Hennessey PA, Formica MA, Cox C, Walsh EE. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in elderly and high-risk adults. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:1749–59. - PubMed
    1. Dowell SF, Anderson LJ, Gary HE Jr et al. . Respiratory syncytial virus is an important cause of community-acquired lower respiratory infection among hospitalized adults. J Infect Dis 1996; 174:456–62. - PubMed
    1. Cameron RJ, de Wit D, Welsh TN, Ferguson J, Grissell TV, Rye PJ. Virus infection in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring ventilation. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32:1022–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Templeton KE, Scheltinga SA, van den Eeden WC, Graffelman AW, van den Broek PJ, Claas EC. Improved diagnosis of the etiology of community-acquired pneumonia with real-time polymerase chain reaction. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 41:345–51. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data