Randomized Trial Comparing Burr Hole Craniostomy, Minicraniotomy, and Twist Drill Craniostomy for Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma
- PMID: 35593710
- DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000001997
Randomized Trial Comparing Burr Hole Craniostomy, Minicraniotomy, and Twist Drill Craniostomy for Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Abstract
Background: The mainstay of treatment for symptomatic or large chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is surgery, but controversy still exists regarding the best surgical technique. Three different techniques are commonly used: burr hole craniostomy (BHC), minicraniotomy (MC), and twist drill craniostomy (TDC).
Objective: To determine which surgical technique for drainage of CSDH offers best results.
Methods: We set up a multicenter prospective randomized trial (Comparison of Chronic Subdural Hematoma Treatment [COMPACT] trial) comparing BHC, MC, and TDC for the surgical treatment of CSDH. The primary end point was reoperation rate, and secondary end points included complication rates and clinical outcome. Patients were considered to have good outcome when they did not undergo reoperation, suffered no surgical or medical complication, and had no related mortality. Clinical outcome was also evaluated by evolution of the Markwalder score and the modified Rankin score.
Results: Two-hundred forty-five patients were included in the final analysis: 79 BHC, 84 MC, and 82 TDC. Mean duration of surgery was shorter for TDC than for BHC and MC ( P < .001). Reoperation rate was 7.6% for BHC, 13.1% for MC, and 19.5% for TDC ( P = .07). This trend toward better results for BHC was not statistically significant in logistic regression analysis. The proportion of patients with good outcome was 78.5% for BHC group, 76.2% for MC, and 69.5% for TDC ( P = .4). Evolution of the Markwalder score and modified Rankin score were not significantly different between treatment groups.
Conclusion: All 3 techniques are effective at treating patients with CSDH with eventual 6-month outcome being similar. Although not reaching statistical significance in our study, BHC offers the lowest recurrence rate combined with manageable complication rate.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02655445.
Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2022. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Commentary: Randomized Trial Comparing Burr Hole Craniostomy, Minicraniotomy, and Twist Drill Craniostomy for Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma.Neurosurgery. 2022 Sep 1;91(3):e100-e101. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002076. Epub 2022 Jul 11. Neurosurgery. 2022. PMID: 35876671 No abstract available.
References
-
- Kolias AG, Chari A, Santarius T, Hutchinson PJ. Chronic subdural haematoma: modern management and emerging therapies. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(10):570-578.
-
- Iorio-Morin C, Touchette C, Lévesque M, Effendi K, Fortin D, Mathieu D. Chronic subdural hematoma: toward a new management paradigm for an increasingly complex population. J Neurotrauma. 2018;35(16):1882-1885.
-
- Ducruet AF, Grobelny BT, Zacharia BE, et al. The surgical management of chronic subdural hematoma. Neurosurg Rev. 2012;35(2):155-169.
-
- Rauhala M, Helén P, Huhtala H, et al. Chronic subdural hematoma-incidence, complications, and financial impact. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020;162(9):2033-2043.
-
- Miranda LB, Braxton E, Hobbs J, Quigley MR. Chronic subdural hematoma in the elderly: not a benign disease. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2011;114(1):72-76.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
