Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Nov 5:14:1911-1924.
doi: 10.2147/CIA.S208388. eCollection 2019.

Mobile Geriatric Teams - A Cost-Effective Way Of Improving Patient Safety And Reducing Traditional Healthcare Utilization Among The Frail Elderly? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Sofi Fristedt  1   2   3 , Paul Nystedt  4 , Örjan Skogar  2   5
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Mobile Geriatric Teams - A Cost-Effective Way Of Improving Patient Safety And Reducing Traditional Healthcare Utilization Among The Frail Elderly? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Sofi Fristedt et al. Clin Interv Aging. .

Abstract

Background: Demographic changes combined with costly technological progress put a financial strain on the healthcare sector in the industrialized world. Hence, there is a constant need to develop new cost-effective treatment procedures in order to optimize the use of available resources. As a response, the concept of a Mobile Geriatric Team (MGT) has emerged not only nationally but also internationally during the last decade; however, scientific evaluation of this initiative has been very scarce. Thus, the objective of this study was to perform a mixed methods analysis, including a prospective, controlled and randomized quantitative evaluation, in combination with an interview-based qualitative assessment, to measure the effectiveness and user satisfaction of MGT.

Materials and methods: Community-dwelling, frail elderly people were randomized to an intervention group (n=31, mean age 84) and a control group (n=31, mean age 86). A two-year retrospective quantitative data collection and a prospective one-year follow-up on healthcare utilization were combined with qualitative interviews. Non-parametric statistics and difference-in-difference (DiD) analyses were applied to the quantitative data. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis.

Results: No significant group differences in healthcare utilization were found before inclusion. Post intervention, primary care contact (including MGTs) increased for the MGT group. Inpatient care decreased dramatically for both groups. Hence, the increase in primary care contact for MGT patients was not accompanied by a reduction in inpatient care compared to the control group. Utilization of non-primary care was lower (p< 0.01) post-intervention in both groups.

Conclusion: There appears to be a "natural" variation in healthcare needs over time among frail elderly people. Hence, it is vital to perform open, controlled clinical studies in tandem with the implementation of new caregiving strategies. The MGT initiative was clearly appreciated but did not fully achieve the desired reduction in healthcare utilization in this study.

Trial registration: Retrospectively registered 09/10/2018, ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03662945.

Keywords: frail elderly; healthcare utilization; mobile geriatric team; patient safety; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relative proportions of degrees of chronic illnesses in an elderly population. Reproduced with permission from Lifvergren S. Quality Improvement in Healthcare. Göteborg: Chalmers University of Technology; 2013.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow chart on the sampling process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bloom DE, Chatterji S, Kowal P, et al. Macroeconomic implications of population ageing and selected policy responses. Lancet. 2015;385(9968):649–657. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61464-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Folkhälsomyndigheten. Folkhälsan I Sverige 2016. Årlig Rapportering [Public Health in Sweden 2016. Yearly Report]. Stockholm: Public Health Agency of Sweden; 2016.
    1. Persson G, Boström G, Allebeck P, et al. Chapter 5. Elderly people’s health–65 and after. Health in Sweden: the National Public Health Report 2001. Scand J Public Health. 2001;58:117–131. - PubMed
    1. Dent E, Kowal P, Hoogendijk EO. Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: a review. Eur J Intern Med. 2016;31(SupplementC):3–10. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yazdanyar A, Newman AB. The burden of cardiovascular disease in the elderly: morbidity, mortality, and costs. Clin Geriatr Med. 2009;25(4):563–vii. doi:10.1016/j.cger.2009.07.007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data