Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct;92(4):e70004.
doi: 10.1111/aji.70004.

Role of Inflammatory Markers and Doppler Parameters in Late-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction: A Machine-Learning Approach

Affiliations

Role of Inflammatory Markers and Doppler Parameters in Late-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction: A Machine-Learning Approach

Can Ozan Ulusoy et al. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluates the association of novel inflammatory markers and Doppler parameters in late-onset FGR (fetal growth restriction), utilizing a machine-learning approach to enhance predictive accuracy.

Materials and methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted at the Department of Perinatology, Ministry of Health Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, from 2023 to 2024. The study included 240 patients between 32 and 37 weeks of gestation, divided equally between patients diagnosed with late-onset FGR and a control group. We focused on novel inflammatory markers-systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), and neutrophil-percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR)-and their correlation with Doppler parameters of umbilical and uterine arteries. Machine-learning algorithms were employed to analyze the data collected, including demographic, neonatal, and clinical parameters, to develop a predictive model for FGR.

Results: The machine-learning model, specifically the Random Forest algorithm, effectively integrated the inflammatory markers with Doppler parameters to predict FGR. NPAR showed a significant correlation with FGR presence, providing a robust tool in the predictive model (Accuracy 77%, area under the curve [AUC] 0.851). In contrast, SII and SIRI, while useful, did not achieve the same level of predictive accuracy (Accuracy 75% AUC 0.818 and Accuracy 73% AUC 0.793, respectively). The model highlighted the potential of combining ultrasound measurements with inflammatory markers to improve diagnostic accuracy for late-onset FGR.

Conclusions: This study illustrates the efficacy of integrating machines with traditional diagnostic methods to enhance the prediction of late-onset FGR. Further research with a larger cohort is recommended to validate these findings and refine the predictive model, which could lead to improved clinical outcomes for affected pregnancies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06372938.

Keywords: Doppler ultrasound; fetal growth restriction; inflammatory markers; late‐onset FGR; machine learning; predictive model.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anon, “Fetal Growth Restriction: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 227,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 137 (2021): e16–e28.
    1. Z. Hracsko, H. Orvos, Z. Novak, A. Pal, and I. S. Varga, “Evaluation of Oxidative Stress Markers in Neonates With Intra‐Uterine Growth Retardation,” Redox Report: Communications in Free Radical Research 13 (2008): 11.
    1. J. A. Wixey, K. K. Chand, P. B. Colditz, and S. T. Bjorkman, “Review: Neuroinflammation in Intrauterine Growth Restriction,” Placenta 54 (2017): 117.
    1. Y. Zhang, Z. Sheng, Q. Chen, et al., “Neutrophil Infiltration Leads to Fetal Growth Restriction by Impairing the Placental Vasculature in DENV‐Infected Pregnant Mice,” EBioMedicine 95 (2023): 104739.
    1. Gordijn, I. M. Beune, B. Thilaganathan, et al., “Consensus Definition of Fetal Growth Restriction: A Delphi Procedure,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 48 (2016): 333.

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources