Nine-year prospective efficacy and safety of brain-responsive neurostimulation for focal epilepsy
- PMID: 32690786
- PMCID: PMC7538230
- DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010154
Nine-year prospective efficacy and safety of brain-responsive neurostimulation for focal epilepsy
Abstract
Objective: To prospectively evaluate safety and efficacy of brain-responsive neurostimulation in adults with medically intractable focal onset seizures (FOS) over 9 years.
Methods: Adults treated with brain-responsive neurostimulation in 2-year feasibility or randomized controlled trials were enrolled in a long-term prospective open label trial (LTT) to assess safety, efficacy, and quality of life (QOL) over an additional 7 years. Safety was assessed as adverse events (AEs), efficacy as median percent change in seizure frequency and responder rate, and QOL with the Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-89) inventory.
Results: Of 256 patients treated in the initial trials, 230 participated in the LTT. At 9 years, the median percent reduction in seizure frequency was 75% (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon signed rank), responder rate was 73%, and 35% had a ≥90% reduction in seizure frequency. We found that 18.4% (47 of 256) experienced ≥1 year of seizure freedom, with 62% (29 of 47) seizure-free at the last follow-up and an average seizure-free period of 3.2 years (range 1.04-9.6 years). Overall QOL and epilepsy-targeted and cognitive domains of QOLIE-89 remained significantly improved (p < 0.05). There were no serious AEs related to stimulation, and the sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP) rate was significantly lower than predefined comparators (p < 0.05, 1-tailed χ2).
Conclusions: Adjunctive brain-responsive neurostimulation provides significant and sustained reductions in the frequency of FOS with improved QOL. Stimulation was well tolerated; implantation-related AEs were typical of other neurostimulation devices; and SUDEP rates were low.
Clinicaltrialsgov identifier: NCT00572195.
Classification of evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that brain-responsive neurostimulation significantly reduces focal seizures with acceptable safety over 9 years.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
Figures



Comment in
-
Long-term outcomes after responsive neurostimulation for treatment of refractory epilepsy: a single-center experience of 100 cases.J Neurosurg. 2023 Mar 31;139(5):1463-1470. doi: 10.3171/2023.2.JNS222116. Print 2023 Nov 1. J Neurosurg. 2023. PMID: 37655833
References
-
- Engel J Jr, Wiebe S, French J, et al. . Practice parameter: temporal lobe and localized neocortical resections for epilepsy. Epilepsia 2003;44:741–751. - PubMed
-
- Shimamoto S, Wu C, Sperling MR. Laser interstitial thermal therapy in drug-resistant epilepsy. Curr Opin Neurol 2019;32:237–245. - PubMed
-
- West S, Nolan SJ, Cotton J, et al. . Surgery for epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;7:CD010541. - PubMed
-
- DeGiorgio CM, Schachter SC, Handforth A, et al. . Prospective long-term study of vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of refractory seizures. Epilepsia 2000;41:1195–1200. - PubMed
-
- Ramsay RE, Uthman BM, Augustinsson LE, et al. . Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of partial seizures, 2: safety, side effects, and tolerability: First International Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group. Epilepsia 1994;35:627–636. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials