Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;30(1):11-20.
doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1333206. Epub 2013 Jan 4.

Cost-effectiveness of trial of labor after previous cesarean in a minimally biased cohort

Collaborators, Affiliations

Cost-effectiveness of trial of labor after previous cesarean in a minimally biased cohort

Sharon A Gilbert et al. Am J Perinatol. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor after one previous cesarean delivery (TOLAC).

Study design: A model comparing TOLAC with elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD) was developed for a hypothetical cohort with no contraindication to a TOLAC. Probabilistic estimates were obtained from women matched on their baseline characteristics using propensity scores. Cost data, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and data on cerebral palsy were incorporated from the literature.

Results: The TOLAC strategy dominated the ERCD strategy at baseline, with $138.6 million saved and 1703 QALYs gained per 100,000 women. The model was sensitive to five variables: the probability of uterine rupture, the probability of successful TOLAC, the QALY of failed TOLAC, the cost of ERCD, and the cost of successful TOLAC without complications. When the probability of TOLAC success was at the base value, 68.5%, TOLAC was preferred if the probability of uterine rupture was 4.2% or less. When the probability of uterine rupture was at the base value, 0.8%, the TOLAC strategy was preferred as long as the probability of success was 42.6% or more.

Conclusion: A TOLAC is less expensive and more effective than an ERCD in a group of women with balanced baseline characteristics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: None of the authors have a conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Tornado Diagram of Five Variables with Thresholds. QALY, quality-adjusted life years; TOLAC, trial of labor after a previous cesarean; ERCD, elective repeat cesarean delivery

References

    1. Guise J-M, McDonagh M, Hashima J, Kraemer DF, Eden KB, Belin M, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). Evidence report/technology. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Mar, 2003. assessment No. 71 (prepared by the Oregon Health & Science University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract no. 290-97-0018). AHRQ Publication No. 03-E018.
    1. Grobman WA, Peaceman AM, Socol ML. Cost-effectiveness of elective cesarean delivery after one prior low transverse cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:745–751. - PubMed
    1. Chung A, Macario A, El-Sayed YY, Riley ET, Duncan B, Druzin ML. Cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor after previous cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:932–941. - PubMed
    1. Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB, Odibo A, Stevens EJ, Stamilio M, et al. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1656–1662. - PubMed
    1. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(12):2581–2589. - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding