Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 17;294(20):8148-8160.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006059. Epub 2019 Apr 2.

High-resolution structure of RGS17 suggests a role for Ca2+ in promoting the GTPase-activating protein activity by RZ subfamily members

Affiliations

High-resolution structure of RGS17 suggests a role for Ca2+ in promoting the GTPase-activating protein activity by RZ subfamily members

Monita Sieng et al. J Biol Chem. .

Abstract

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are negative regulators of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling through their ability to act as GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for activated Gα subunits. Members of the RZ subfamily of RGS proteins bind to activated Gαo, Gαz, and Gαi1-3 proteins in the nervous system and thereby inhibit downstream pathways, including those involved in Ca2+-dependent signaling. In contrast to other RGS proteins, little is known about RZ subfamily structure and regulation. Herein, we present the 1.5-Å crystal structure of RGS17, the most complete and highest-resolution structure of an RZ subfamily member to date. RGS17 cocrystallized with Ca2+ bound to conserved positions on the predicted Gα-binding surface of the protein. Using NMR chemical shift perturbations, we confirmed that Ca2+ binds in solution to the same site. Furthermore, RGS17 had greater than 55-fold higher affinity for Ca2+ than for Mg2+ Finally, we found that Ca2+ promotes interactions between RGS17 and activated Gα and decreases the Km for GTP hydrolysis, potentially by altering the binding mechanism between these proteins. Taken together, these findings suggest that Ca2+ positively regulates RGS17, which may represent a general mechanism by which increased Ca2+ concentration promotes the GAP activity of the RZ subfamily, leading to RZ-mediated inhibition of Ca2+ signaling.

Keywords: G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR); GTPase activating protein (GAP); RGS17; RZ subfamily; calcium; cell signaling; crystal structure; heterotrimeric G protein; isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC); nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR); protein crystallization; regulator of G protein signaling (RGS).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Crystal structure of RGS17 in complex with Ca2+. RGS17 crystallized as a dimer but is monomeric in solution as determined by size-exclusion chromatography and NMR. Chain X is shown color-ramped from blue at the N terminus to red at the C terminus. Chain A is shown in gray, and the r.m.s.d. between chains is 0.6 Å. Strong electron density was observed for four Ca2+ ions (black spheres). The 10 σ |Fo| − |Fc| omit maps for the Ca2+ ions are shown as blue cages, and electron density for these ions persists beyond 20 σ.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Superposition of RGS17 and 1ZV4 (21). The bundle subdomains of RGS17–Ca2+ (cyan; Chain X) and 1ZV4 (fuchsia) (21) have an r.m.s.d. of 0.52 Å for the Cα atoms. The RGS17–Ca2+ terminal subdomain is rotated ∼17° from the bundle subdomain with respect to its orientation in the 1ZV4 structure. The N and C termini of the proteins are labeled N and C. The 1ZV4 structure includes residues 66–143 and 146–204.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The crystallographic RGS17 dimer coordinates four Ca2+ ions. RGS17 chains are colored as in Fig. 1. Ca2+ ions are shown as black spheres, waters are shown as red spheres, and the distance between the Ca2+ ion and the coordinating atoms are shown in dashed yellow lines. All coordination distances are between 2.3 and 2.6 Å. A, the backbone carbonyl oxygen of Tyr-106 and side chain of Glu-109 in the α3–α4 loop coordinate one Ca2+ ion in Chain X. This is in close proximity to Ser-150, the GAP residue in the RZ subfamily. B, as observed in A, RGS17 Chain A also coordinates Ca2+ via Tyr-106 and Glu-109. A second Ca2+ is bound by the backbone carbonyl of Ile-143 and side chain of Glu-148 in the α5–α6 loop. C, the carbonyl oxygen of Gln-124, located in the α4–α5 loop, coordinates a Ca2+ ion in Chain X.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
RGS17 binds Ca2+ in solution. A, 1H-15N 2D HSQC spectra of RGS17 alone (black) or upon addition of 15 mm CaCl2 (red). B, structure of RGS17 where residues that display chemical shift perturbations greater than 0.15 ppm are shown as ball-and-stick in red. Ca2+ is shown as a black sphere. C, graph of CSPs for all the residues that could be assigned in the 1H-15N 2D HSQC spectra for RGS17.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
RGS17 binds Mg2+ in solution. A, 1H-15N 2D HSQC spectra of RGS17 alone (black) or upon addition of 15 mm MgCl2 (red). B, structure of RGS17 where residues with CSPs greater than 0.15 ppm are shown in ball-and-stick in red. In contrast to spectra obtained in the presence of CaCl2, MgCl2 induces CSPs in two regions of RGS17. The locations of the Mg2+ ions (black spheres) are modeled based on the location of Ca2+ atoms observed in the RGS17–Ca2+ crystal structure. C, graph of CSPs for all the residues that could be assigned in the 1H-15N 2D HSQC spectra for RGS17.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
RGS17 binds Ca2+ with higher affinity than Mg2+. The KD,avg for Ca2+ and Mg2+ binding to RGS17 was determined for each amino acid that displayed a significant CSP upon the addition of divalent cation. Two cation-binding sites were identified on RGS17, one formed by Tyr-106 and Glu-109 and a secondary site formed by Ile-143 and Glu-148. Residues adjacent to these binding sites that displayed CSPs >2 S.D. greater than the average CSP were used to calculate the KD,avg for each site by fitting the CSP as a function of ion concentration to a one-site binding model. A, CSP as a function of increasing Ca2+ concentration. The KD,avg for residues Ser-107, Glu-108, Glu-109, and Asn-110 is 132 ± 35 μm, and the KD,avg for residues Ser-145 and Val-149 is 91 ± 6 μm. B, CSP as a function of increasing Mg2+ concentration. The KD,avg for residues Ser-107, Glu-108, Glu-109, and Asn-110 is 34 ± 23 mm, and the KD,avg for residues Ser-145 and Val-149 is 20 ± 4 mm.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
RGS4 binds Ca2+ weakly but does not bind Mg2+. RGS4 shares 40% sequence identity with RGS17, including the residues that bind cations in RGS17. In RGS4, these sites contain Tyr-84 and Glu-86 (RGS17 Tyr-106 and Glu-109) and Val-121 and Glu-126 (RGS17 Ile-143 and Glu-148). A, graph of CSPs for all residues that could be assigned in the 1H-15N 2D HSQC spectra of RGS4 (25) upon addition of 40-fold molar excess CaCl2. B, residues including and adjacent to the putative cation-binding sites in RGS4 that displaced CSPs >2 S.D. greater than the average CSP were used to calculate the KD,avg for each site by fitting the CSP as a function of ion concentration to a one-site binding model. CSP was determined as a function of increasing Ca2+ concentration. The KD,avg for residues Tyr-84, S85, Glu-86, Glu-87, Asn-88, and Ile-89 is 9.6 ± 3 mm, and the KD,avg for residues Ala-123, Lys-125, and Val-127 is 6.1 ± 1.6 mm. C, graph of CSPs for all residues assigned in the 1H-15N 2D HSQC spectra of RGS4 upon addition of 40-fold molar excess MgCl2. D, CSP as a function of increasing Mg2+ concentration. The KD,avg for residues Ser-85, Glu-86, Glu-87, and Asn-88 is 93 ± 193 mm, and the KD,avg for residues Ala-125 and Lys-125 is 90 ± 75 mm.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
CaCl2 enhances the binding of activated Gαo by RGS17 but not RGS4. An AlphaScreen assay was using to detect and quantify the binding of RGS17 to Gαo. A, RGS17 binding to activated Gαo is increased upon the addition of 5 mm CaCl2 (purple inverted triangle) relative to the control (blue circle), consistent with Ca2+ promoting binding. Addition of 10 mm EGTA, which preferentially chelates free Ca2+ in solution, has no effect on the RGS17–Gαo interaction. In contrast, addition of 10 mm EDTA (red squares), which preferentially chelates free Mg2+ in solution, decreases the binding between RGS17 and Gαo. This could be due to loss of Mg2+ bound to RGS17, or it may reflect a decrease in the amount of activated Gαo, which requires Mg2+ for stability. B, quantitation of saturation binding curves shown in A. C, RGS4 binding to activated Gαo (blue circles) is not altered by CaCl2 (purple inverted triangles), EDTA (red squares), or EGTA (green triangles). D, quantitation of saturation binding curves shown in C. Data represent the mean of three independent experiments ±S.E. (error bars, *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01).
Figure 9.
Figure 9.
Ca2+ increases RGS17-stimulated GTP hydrolysis. A GTPase-Glo assay was used to detect and quantify RGS-stimulated GTP hydrolysis on a rate-altered Gαi1 mutant, Gαi1 R178M/A326S. A, RGS17 increases the rate of GTP hydrolysis in the presence (red squares) or absence (blue circles) of saturating CaCl2. Addition of CaCl2 significantly decreased the Km (Table 2). B, RGS4 stimulates GTP hydrolysis on Gαi1 but is insensitive to the presence of CaCl2. Data represents the mean of four independent experiments ±S.E. (error bars).
Figure 10.
Figure 10.
ITC characterization of RGS17-Gαo in the absence (left) and presence (right) of saturating levels of Ca2+. KD values were calculated to be 611 ± 128.5 and 596 ± 257 nm in the absence and presence of Ca2+, respectively. The binding enthalpies were −7.33 ± 0.72 and −2.76 ± 0.74 kcal/mol in the absence and presence of Ca2+, respectively.

References

    1. Oldham W. M., and Hamm H. E. (2008) Heterotrimeric G protein activation by G-protein-coupled receptors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 60–71 10.1038/nrm2299 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dohlman H. G., Apaniesk D., Chen Y., Song J., and Nusskern D. (1995) Inhibition of G-protein signaling by dominant gain-of-function mutations in Sst2p, a pheromone desensitization factor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 3635–3643 10.1128/MCB.15.7.3635 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Vries L., Zheng B., Fischer T., Elenko E., and Farquhar M. G. (2000) The Regulator of G protein signaling family. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 40, 235–271 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.40.1.235 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Koelle M. R., and Horvitz H. R. (1996) EGL-10 regulates G protein signaling in the C. elegans nervous system and shares a conserved domain with many mammalian proteins. Cell 84, 115–125 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80998-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berman D. M., Wilkie T. M., and Gilman A. G. (1996) GAIP and RGS4 are GTPase-activating proteins for the Gi subfamily of G protein α subunits. Cell 86, 445–452 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80117-8 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources