Worth the paper it's written on? A cross-sectional study of Medical Certificate of Stillbirth accuracy in the UK
- PMID: 35724686
- PMCID: PMC9908049
- DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyac100
Worth the paper it's written on? A cross-sectional study of Medical Certificate of Stillbirth accuracy in the UK
Abstract
Background: The Medical Certificate of Stillbirth (MCS) records data about a baby's death after 24 weeks of gestation but before birth. Major errors that could alter interpretation of the MCS were widespread in two UK-based regional studies.
Methods: A multicentre evaluation was conducted, examining MCS issued 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2018 in 76 UK obstetric units. A systematic case-note review of stillbirths was conducted by Obstetric and Gynaecology trainees, generating individual 'ideal MCSs' and comparing these to the actual MCS issued. Anonymized central data analysis described rates and types of error, agreement and factors associated with major errors.
Results: There were 1120 MCSs suitable for assessment, with 126 additional submitted data sets unsuitable for accuracy analysis (total 1246 cases). Gestational age demonstrated 'substantial' agreement [K = 0.73 (95% CI 0.70-0.76)]. Primary cause of death (COD) showed 'fair' agreement [K = 0.26 (95% CI 0.24-0.29)]. Major errors [696/1120; 62.1% (95% CI 59.3-64.9%)] included certificates issued for fetal demise at <24 weeks' gestation [23/696; 3.3% (95% CI 2.2-4.9%)] or neonatal death [2/696; 0.3% (95% CI 0.1-1.1%)] or incorrect primary COD [667/696; 95.8% (95% CI 94.1-97.1%)]. Of 540/1246 [43.3% (95% CI 40.6-46.1%)] 'unexplained' stillbirths, only 119/540 [22.0% (95% CI 18.8-25.7%)] remained unexplained; the majority were redesignated as either fetal growth restriction [FGR: 195/540; 36.1% (95% CI 32.2-40.3%)] or placental insufficiency [184/540; 34.1% (95% CI 30.2-38.2)]. Overall, FGR [306/1246; 24.6% (95% CI 22.3-27.0%)] was the leading primary COD after review, yet only 53/306 [17.3% (95% CI 13.5-22.1%)] FGR cases were originally attributed correctly.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates widespread major errors in MCS completion across the UK. MCS should only be completed following structured case-note review, with particular attention on the fetal growth trajectory.
Keywords: Stillbirth; accuracy; cause of death; death certification; fetal growth restriction; perinatal death; placental insufficiency; stillbirth certification.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.
Figures
References
-
- Still-Birth (Definition) Act 1992, Chapter 29. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1992/29/section/1 (11 May 2022, date last accessed).
-
- Office for National Statistics. Child and Infant Mortality in England and Wales: 2018. London: The Stationery Office, 2020.
-
- Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Society. What happens at a hospital post-mortem on a baby —procedures and likely timings. https://www.sands.org.uk/sites/default/files/What%20happens%20at%20a%20p... (3 February 2022, date last accessed).
-
- Office for National Statistics. Child and Infant Mortality Statistics QMI. London: The Stationery Office, 2021.
-
- NHS England. Saving Babies’ Lives Care Bundle Version 2. London: The Stationery Office, 2019.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
