Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Apr;128(5):866-878.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16472. Epub 2020 Oct 25.

Effect of single- versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting (2Close): multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of single- versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting (2Close): multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial

S I Stegwee et al. BJOG. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether double-layer uterine closure after a first caesarean section (CS) is superior compared with single-layer uterine closure in terms of postmenstrual spotting and niche development in the uterine caesarean scar.

Design: Multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial.

Setting: Thirty-two hospitals in the Netherlands.

Population: A total of 2292 women aged ≥18 years undergoing a first CS were randomly assigned to each procedure (1:1): 1144 women were assigned to single-layer uterine closure and 1148 women were assigned to double-layer uterine closure.

Methods: Single-layer unlocked closure and double-layer unlocked closure, with the second layer imbricating the first.

Main outcome measures: Number of days with postmenstrual spotting during one menstrual cycle 9 months after CS.

Secondary outcomes: perioperative and menstrual characteristics; transvaginal ultrasound measurements.

Results: A total of 774 (67.7%) women from the single-layer group and 770 (67.1%) women from the double-layer group were evaluable for the primary outcome, as a result of drop-out and amenorrhoea. The mean number of postmenstrual spotting days was 1.33 (bootstrapped 95% CI 1.12-1.54) after single-layer closure and 1.26 (bootstrapped 95% CI 1.07-1.45) after double-layer closure (adjusted mean difference -0.07, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.22, P = 0.810). The operative time was 3.9 minutes longer (95% CI 3.0-4.9 minutes, P < 0.001) and niche prevalence was 4.7% higher (95% CI 0.7-8.7%, P = 0.022) after double-layer closure.

Conclusions: The superiority of double-layer closure compared with single-layer closure in terms of postmenstrual spotting after a first CS was not shown. Long-term obstetric follow-up of our trial is needed to assess whether uterine caesarean closure guidelines should be adapted.

Tweetable abstract: Double-layer uterine closure is not superior for postmenstrual spotting after a first caesarean; single-layer closure performs slightly better on other outcomes.

Keywords: Caesarean section; double layer; niche; postmenstrual spotting; single layer; uterine closure technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Niche after caesarean section on transvaginal ultrasound, without the use of contrast. A niche is visible, indicated with an asterisk *, in the caesarean uterine scar.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trial profile. *Logistical reasons, computer randomisation issues, passing through the allocated method to operating gynaecologist or participant not traceable. †Not mutually exclusive: an overlap between groups is possible. ‡Secondary sonographic outcomes reported for this group. §Secondary patient reported outcomes not related to menstruation reported for this group.

Comment in

References

    1. Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet 2018;392:1341–8. - PubMed
    1. Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, et al. Short‐term and long‐term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet 2018;392:1349–57. - PubMed
    1. Abalos E, Addo V, Brocklehurst P, El Sheikh M, Farrell B, Gray S, et al. Caesarean section surgical techniques: 3 year follow‐up of the CORONIS fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016;388:62–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bij de Vaate AJM, Brölmann HAM, van der Voet LF, van der Slikke JW, Veersema S, Huirne JAF. Ultrasound evaluation of the Cesarean scar: relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting. Ultrasound Obstetrics & Gynecol 2011;37:93–9. - PubMed
    1. van der Voet LF, Bij de Vaate AM, Veersema S, Brolmann HA, Huirne JA. Long‐term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding. BJOG 2014;121:236–44. - PubMed

Publication types