Twice-Daily Clopidogrel vs Ticagrelor to Reduce Short-Term Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The TADCLOT Trial
- PMID: 40892606
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.08.041
Twice-Daily Clopidogrel vs Ticagrelor to Reduce Short-Term Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The TADCLOT Trial
Abstract
Background: The first month postprimary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is the highest risk period for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including stent thrombosis. Ticagrelor and double-dose clopidogrel are effective antiplatelet therapies, but no head-to-head comparison exists in this setting.
Objectives: The authors sought to evaluate the efficacy of ticagrelor over twice-daily clopidogrel in reducing MACE events within the first 1 month postprimary PCI.
Methods: TADCLOT (Twice-A-Day CLOpidogrel vs Ticagrelor), a double-blind, randomized superiority trial at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Karachi, Pakistan (February 19, 2024 to January 30, 2025), randomized 2,201 patients with STEMI within 24 hours of primary PCI 1:1 to ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose, 90 mg twice a day) or twice-daily clopidogrel (600-mg loading dose, 75 mg twice a day) for 1 month. The primary endpoint was MACEs (death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or target lesion revascularization) at 1 month, analyzed by intention to treat. Secondary endpoints were individual MACE components and clinically significant bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] type 2, 3, or 5).
Results: Among 2,201 randomized patients, MACEs occurred in 24 (2.2%) ticagrelor patients vs 32 (2.9%) in twice-daily clopidogrel patients (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.44-1.27; P = 0.28; absolute risk difference: -0.7%; 95% CI: -2.05 to 0.60). Cardiovascular death or definite stent thrombosis occurred in 21 (1.9%) vs 27 (2.5%) patients (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.44-1.37). Clinically significant bleeding (BARC type 2, 3, or 5) occurred in 6 patients (0.5%) with ticagrelor vs 4 (0.4%) with clopidogrel (HR: 1.50; 95% CI: 0.42-5.31). Major bleeding (BARC type 3 or 5) was infrequent and similar between the groups: 3 patients (0.3%) in the ticagrelor arm and 2 (0.2%) in the clopidogrel arm (HR: 1.50; 95% CI: 0.25-8.97). At both 7 (HR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.04-0.5; P = 0.002) and 14 days (HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.23-0.91; P = 0.02), MACEs were significantly lower with ticagrelor compared with twice-daily clopidogrel, although these differences were no longer statistically significant at 30 days.
Conclusions: Ticagrelor was not superior to twice-daily clopidogrel in reducing MACEs at 1 month after primary PCI, and bleeding rates were similar. However, event rates were lower than anticipated, and ticagrelor significantly reduced MACEs within the first 2 weeks compared with twice-daily clopidogrel. (TADCLOT-a Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial [TADCLOT]; NCT06318481).
Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; adverse events; antiplatelet therapy; stent thrombosis.
Copyright © 2025 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding Support and Author Disclosures The study was funded by an unrestricted research grant from PharmEvo Pvt Ltd (Karachi, Pakistan). The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous