Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock
- PMID: 18305265
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa067373
Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock
Abstract
Background: Vasopressin is commonly used as an adjunct to catecholamines to support blood pressure in refractory septic shock, but its effect on mortality is unknown. We hypothesized that low-dose vasopressin as compared with norepinephrine would decrease mortality among patients with septic shock who were being treated with conventional (catecholamine) vasopressors.
Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned patients who had septic shock and were receiving a minimum of 5 microg of norepinephrine per minute to receive either low-dose vasopressin (0.01 to 0.03 U per minute) or norepinephrine (5 to 15 microg per minute) in addition to open-label vasopressors. All vasopressor infusions were titrated and tapered according to protocols to maintain a target blood pressure. The primary end point was the mortality rate 28 days after the start of infusions.
Results: A total of 778 patients underwent randomization, were infused with the study drug (396 patients received vasopressin, and 382 norepinephrine), and were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference between the vasopressin and norepinephrine groups in the 28-day mortality rate (35.4% and 39.3%, respectively; P=0.26) or in 90-day mortality (43.9% and 49.6%, respectively; P=0.11). There were no significant differences in the overall rates of serious adverse events (10.3% and 10.5%, respectively; P=1.00). In the prospectively defined stratum of less severe septic shock, the mortality rate was lower in the vasopressin group than in the norepinephrine group at 28 days (26.5% vs. 35.7%, P=0.05); in the stratum of more severe septic shock, there was no significant difference in 28-day mortality (44.0% and 42.5%, respectively; P=0.76). A test for heterogeneity between these two study strata was not significant (P=0.10).
Conclusions: Low-dose vasopressin did not reduce mortality rates as compared with norepinephrine among patients with septic shock who were treated with catecholamine vasopressors. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN94845869 [controlled-trials.com].).
Copyright 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Comment in
-
Septic shock--vasopressin, norepinephrine, and urgency.N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 28;358(9):954-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0800245. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 18305271 No abstract available.
-
Vasopressin in septic shock.N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 19;358(25):2736; author reply 2737-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc080666. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 18565870 No abstract available.
-
Vasopressin in septic shock.N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 19;358(25):2736; author reply 2737-8. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 18572442 No abstract available.
-
Vasopressin in septic shock.N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 19;358(25):2736-7; author reply 2737-8. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 18572443 No abstract available.
-
Vasopressin in septic shock.N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 19;358(25):2737; author reply 2737-8. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 18572444 No abstract available.
-
Vasopressin: useful or not?Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2008 Sep;10(5):351-2. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2008. PMID: 18687195 No abstract available.
-
Low-dose vasopressin did not reduce mortality more than norepinephrine in septic shock.ACP J Club. 2008 Sep 16;149(3):14. ACP J Club. 2008. PMID: 18783190 No abstract available.
-
Best evidence in critical care medicine. Vasopressin in septic shock: pressing questions remain.Can J Anaesth. 2009 Jan;56(1):80-2. doi: 10.1007/s12630-008-9009-2. Epub 2008 Dec 19. Can J Anaesth. 2009. PMID: 19247781 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical